Comparison between AMD Athlon X4 880K and Intel Atom E3815
AMD Athlon X4 880K is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Atom E3815 is manufactured by Intel.
AMD Athlon X4 880K has a higher base speed of 4.0 GHz compared to Intel Atom E3815's 1.5 GHz.
AMD Athlon X4 880K has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to Intel Atom E3815's GHz.
AMD Athlon X4 880K has more cores (4) compared to Intel Atom E3815's 1 cores.
Intel Atom E3815 supports more threads (1) compared to AMD Athlon X4 880K's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Athlon X4 880K uses the FM2+ socket, while Intel Atom E3815 uses the FCBGA1170 socket.
AMD Athlon X4 880K was launched in Q2 2016, while Intel Atom E3815 was launched in Q2 2014.
Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Athlon X4 880K and Intel Atom E3815 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 880K has a base speed of 4.0 GHz, while the Intel Atom E3815 runs at 1.5 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Athlon X4 880K supports a turbo speed of 4.2 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Atom E3815.
Cores: The AMD Athlon X4 880K has 4 cores, while the Intel Atom E3815 has 1 cores.
Threads: The AMD Athlon X4 880K supports threads, compared to 1 threads for the Intel Atom E3815.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Athlon X4 880K uses the FM2+, while the Intel Atom E3815 uses the FCBGA1170.
Launch Date: The AMD Athlon X4 880K was launched on Q2 2016, while the Intel Atom E3815 was released on Q2 2014.
L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon X4 880K has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the Intel Atom E3815.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Athlon X4 880K
Intel Atom E3815
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
4.0 GHz
1.5 GHz
Turbo
4.2 GHz
GHz
Cores
4
1
Threads
1
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FM2+
FCBGA1170
Launched
Q2 2016
Q2 2014
L3 Cache
MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Athlon X4 880K:
27%
Intel Atom E3815:
4%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Athlon X4 880K
5%
Intel Atom E3815:
0%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Athlon X4 880K: 95 watts
23.75%
Intel Atom E3815: 5 watts
1.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Athlon X4 880K : Q2 2016 ✅
Intel Atom E3815 : Q2 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Athlon X4 880K
Intel Atom E3815
Pro's and Con's
AMD Athlon X4 880K – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Athlon X4 880K was launched more recently (Q2 2016) compared to the Intel Atom E3815 (Q2 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 880K has a higher base clock speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the Intel Atom E3815's 1.5 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 880K supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the Intel Atom E3815's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1633, the AMD Athlon X4 880K outperforms the Intel Atom E3815 (score: 266). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Athlon X4 880K has a higher CPU Mark score of 38.71 compared to the Intel Atom E3815's 1.36. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD Athlon X4 880K has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Atom E3815's 1 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Athlon X4 880K has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the Intel Atom E3815's 5W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Atom E3815 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Not available
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Atom E3815 has 1 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon X4 880K's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Atom E3815 scores 184, which is lower than the AMD Athlon X4 880K's score of 3663. This makes the AMD Athlon X4 880K a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Athlon X4 880K
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Atom E3815
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Athlon X4 880K
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Atom E3815
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Athlon X4 880K
The AMD Athlon X4 880K is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Atom E3815
The Intel Atom E3815 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
