Comparison between AMD Athlon X4 880K and Intel Core i3-6100
AMD Athlon X4 880K is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Core i3-6100 is manufactured by Intel.
AMD Athlon X4 880K has a higher base speed of 4.0 GHz compared to Intel Core i3-6100's 3.7 GHz.
AMD Athlon X4 880K has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to Intel Core i3-6100's GHz.
AMD Athlon X4 880K has more cores (4) compared to Intel Core i3-6100's 2 cores.
Intel Core i3-6100 supports more threads (4) compared to AMD Athlon X4 880K's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Athlon X4 880K uses the FM2+ socket, while Intel Core i3-6100 uses the LGA socket.
AMD Athlon X4 880K was launched in Q2 2016, while Intel Core i3-6100 was launched in Q4 2015.
Intel Core i3-6100 has a larger L3 cache of 3 MB compared to AMD Athlon X4 880K's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Athlon X4 880K and Intel Core i3-6100 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 880K has a base speed of 4.0 GHz, while the Intel Core i3-6100 runs at 3.7 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Athlon X4 880K supports a turbo speed of 4.2 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Core i3-6100.
Cores: The AMD Athlon X4 880K has 4 cores, while the Intel Core i3-6100 has 2 cores.
Threads: The AMD Athlon X4 880K supports threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Core i3-6100.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Athlon X4 880K uses the FM2+, while the Intel Core i3-6100 uses the LGA.
Launch Date: The AMD Athlon X4 880K was launched on Q2 2016, while the Intel Core i3-6100 was released on Q4 2015.
L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon X4 880K has MB of L3 cache, compared to 3 MB for the Intel Core i3-6100.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Athlon X4 880K
Intel Core i3-6100
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
4.0 GHz
3.7 GHz
Turbo
4.2 GHz
GHz
Cores
4
2
Threads
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FM2+
LGA
Launched
Q2 2016
Q4 2015
L3 Cache
MB
3 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Athlon X4 880K:
27%
Intel Core i3-6100:
36%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Athlon X4 880K
5%
Intel Core i3-6100:
5%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Athlon X4 880K: 95 watts
23.75%
Intel Core i3-6100: 51 watts
12.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Athlon X4 880K : Q2 2016 ✅
Intel Core i3-6100 : Q4 2015 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Athlon X4 880K
Intel Core i3-6100
Pro's and Con's
AMD Athlon X4 880K – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 880K has a higher base clock speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the Intel Core i3-6100's 3.7 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 880K supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the Intel Core i3-6100's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD Athlon X4 880K has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i3-6100's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon X4 880K scores 3663, which is lower than the Intel Core i3-6100's score of 4136. This makes the Intel Core i3-6100 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Athlon X4 880K has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the Intel Core i3-6100's 51W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Core i3-6100 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Core i3-6100 was launched more recently (Q4 2015) compared to the AMD Athlon X4 880K (Q2 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2181, the Intel Core i3-6100 outperforms the AMD Athlon X4 880K (score: 1633). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-6100 features a larger L3 cache of 3MB compared to the AMD Athlon X4 880K's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Core i3-6100 has a higher CPU Mark score of 48.66 compared to the AMD Athlon X4 880K's 38.71. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Core i3-6100 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon X4 880K's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Productivity
AMD Athlon X4 880K
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Core i3-6100
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Athlon X4 880K
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Core i3-6100
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Athlon X4 880K
The AMD Athlon X4 880K is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Core i3-6100
The Intel Core i3-6100 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
