🚀 CPU Launch

Home » Compare » AMD-Athlon-X4-970-vs-AMD-FX-4320

AMD Athlon X4 970 vs AMD FX-4320

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between AMD Athlon X4 970 and AMD FX-4320

Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD. AMD FX-4320 has a higher base speed of 4.0 GHz compared to AMD Athlon X4 970's 3.8 GHz. AMD FX-4320 has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to AMD Athlon X4 970's 4.0 GHz. Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4). Both CPUs support the same number of threads ().

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. AMD Athlon X4 970 uses the AM4 socket, while AMD FX-4320 uses the AM3+ socket. AMD Athlon X4 970 was launched in Q4 2023, while AMD FX-4320 was launched in Q1 2016. AMD FX-4320 has a larger L3 cache of 4 MB compared to AMD Athlon X4 970's MB.

Specification Summary

The AMD Athlon X4 970 and AMD FX-4320 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
  • Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 970 has a base speed of 3.8 GHz, while the AMD FX-4320 runs at 4.0 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The AMD Athlon X4 970 supports a turbo speed of 4.0 GHz, compared to 4.2 GHz for the AMD FX-4320.
  • Cores: The AMD Athlon X4 970 has 4 cores, while the AMD FX-4320 has 4 cores.
  • Threads: The AMD Athlon X4 970 supports threads, compared to threads for the AMD FX-4320.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The AMD Athlon X4 970 uses the AM4, while the AMD FX-4320 uses the AM3+.
  • Launch Date: The AMD Athlon X4 970 was launched on Q4 2023, while the AMD FX-4320 was released on Q1 2016.
  • L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon X4 970 has MB of L3 cache, compared to 4 MB for the AMD FX-4320.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs AMD Athlon X4 970 AMD FX-4320
AMD AMD
Manufacturer AMD AMD
Speed 3.8 GHz 4.0 GHz
Turbo 4.0 GHz 4.2 GHz
Cores 4 4
Threads
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket AM4 AM3+
Launched Q4 2023 Q1 2016
L3 Cache MB 4 MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

AMD Athlon X4 970:



26%
AMD FX-4320:
26%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

AMD Athlon X4 970



5%
AMD FX-4320:
4%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

AMD Athlon X4 970: 65 watts



16.25%
AMD FX-4320: 95 watts
23.75%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


AMD Athlon X4 970 : Q4 2023 ✅

AMD FX-4320 : Q1 2016 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

AMD Athlon X4 970



AMD FX-4320


Pro's and Con's

AMD Athlon X4 970 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The AMD Athlon X4 970 was launched more recently (Q4 2023) compared to the AMD FX-4320 (Q1 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1616, the AMD Athlon X4 970 outperforms the AMD FX-4320 (score: 1564). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.

Cons:

  • Not available

AMD FX-4320 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD FX-4320 has a higher base clock speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon X4 970's 3.8 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
  • Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD FX-4320 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon X4 970's 4.0 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
  • Larger L3 Cache: The AMD FX-4320 features a larger L3 cache of 4MB compared to the AMD Athlon X4 970's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.

Cons:

  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD FX-4320 scores 3150, which is lower than the AMD Athlon X4 970's score of 3472. This makes the AMD Athlon X4 970 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
  • Higher Power Consumption: The AMD FX-4320 has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the AMD Athlon X4 970's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.


Productivity


AMD Athlon X4 970
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

AMD FX-4320
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

AMD Athlon X4 970
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

AMD FX-4320
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.



Verdict

AMD Athlon X4 970

The AMD Athlon X4 970 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

AMD FX-4320

The AMD FX-4320 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.