🚀 CPU Launch

AMD Athlon X4 970 vs Intel Celeron J3455

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between AMD Athlon X4 970 and Intel Celeron J3455

AMD Athlon X4 970 is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Celeron J3455 is manufactured by Intel. AMD Athlon X4 970 has a higher base speed of 3.8 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J3455's 1.5 GHz. AMD Athlon X4 970 has a higher turbo speed of 4.0 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J3455's 2.3 GHz. Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4). Intel Celeron J3455 supports more threads (4) compared to AMD Athlon X4 970's threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. AMD Athlon X4 970 uses the AM4 socket, while Intel Celeron J3455 uses the FCBGA1296 socket. AMD Athlon X4 970 was launched in Q4 2023, while Intel Celeron J3455 was launched in Q4 2016. Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.

Specification Summary

The AMD Athlon X4 970 and Intel Celeron J3455 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
  • Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 970 has a base speed of 3.8 GHz, while the Intel Celeron J3455 runs at 1.5 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The AMD Athlon X4 970 supports a turbo speed of 4.0 GHz, compared to 2.3 GHz for the Intel Celeron J3455.
  • Cores: The AMD Athlon X4 970 has 4 cores, while the Intel Celeron J3455 has 4 cores.
  • Threads: The AMD Athlon X4 970 supports threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Celeron J3455.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The AMD Athlon X4 970 uses the AM4, while the Intel Celeron J3455 uses the FCBGA1296.
  • Launch Date: The AMD Athlon X4 970 was launched on Q4 2023, while the Intel Celeron J3455 was released on Q4 2016.
  • L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon X4 970 has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the Intel Celeron J3455.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs AMD Athlon X4 970 Intel Celeron J3455
AMD Intel
Manufacturer AMD Intel
Speed 3.8 GHz 1.5 GHz
Turbo 4.0 GHz 2.3 GHz
Cores 4 4
Threads 4
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket AM4 FCBGA1296
Launched Q4 2023 Q4 2016
L3 Cache MB MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

AMD Athlon X4 970:



26%
Intel Celeron J3455:
13%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

AMD Athlon X4 970



5%
Intel Celeron J3455:
3%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

AMD Athlon X4 970: 65 watts



16.25%
Intel Celeron J3455: 10 watts
2.5%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


AMD Athlon X4 970 : Q4 2023 ✅

Intel Celeron J3455 : Q4 2016 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

AMD Athlon X4 970



Intel Celeron J3455


Pro's and Con's

AMD Athlon X4 970 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The AMD Athlon X4 970 was launched more recently (Q4 2023) compared to the Intel Celeron J3455 (Q4 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 970 has a higher base clock speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J3455's 1.5 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
  • Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 970 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J3455's 2.3 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1616, the AMD Athlon X4 970 outperforms the Intel Celeron J3455 (score: 813). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
  • Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Athlon X4 970 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Celeron J3455's 6.45. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

  • Fewer Threads: The AMD Athlon X4 970 has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron J3455's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
  • Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Athlon X4 970 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron J3455's 10W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.

Intel Celeron J3455 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Not available

Cons:

  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron J3455 scores 2252, which is lower than the AMD Athlon X4 970's score of 3472. This makes the AMD Athlon X4 970 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.


Productivity


AMD Athlon X4 970
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Intel Celeron J3455
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

AMD Athlon X4 970
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

Intel Celeron J3455
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.



Verdict

AMD Athlon X4 970

The AMD Athlon X4 970 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

Intel Celeron J3455

The Intel Celeron J3455 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.