Comparison between AMD E2-9030 and Intel Core i5-6400
AMD E2-9030 is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Core i5-6400 is manufactured by Intel.
Intel Core i5-6400 has a higher base speed of 2.7 GHz compared to AMD E2-9030's 2.0 GHz.
Intel Core i5-6400 has a higher turbo speed of 3.3 GHz compared to AMD E2-9030's 2.2 GHz.
Intel Core i5-6400 has more cores (4) compared to AMD E2-9030's 2 cores.
Intel Core i5-6400 supports more threads (4) compared to AMD E2-9030's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD E2-9030 uses the BGA socket, while Intel Core i5-6400 uses the LGA socket.
AMD E2-9030 was launched in Q1 2019, while Intel Core i5-6400 was launched in Q3 2015.
Intel Core i5-6400 has a larger L3 cache of 6 MB compared to AMD E2-9030's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD E2-9030 and Intel Core i5-6400 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD E2-9030 has a base speed of 2.0 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-6400 runs at 2.7 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD E2-9030 supports a turbo speed of 2.2 GHz, compared to 3.3 GHz for the Intel Core i5-6400.
Cores: The AMD E2-9030 has 2 cores, while the Intel Core i5-6400 has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD E2-9030 supports threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Core i5-6400.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD E2-9030 uses the BGA, while the Intel Core i5-6400 uses the LGA.
Launch Date: The AMD E2-9030 was launched on Q1 2019, while the Intel Core i5-6400 was released on Q3 2015.
L3 Cache: The AMD E2-9030 has MB of L3 cache, compared to 6 MB for the Intel Core i5-6400.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD E2-9030
Intel Core i5-6400
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
2.0 GHz
2.7 GHz
Turbo
2.2 GHz
3.3 GHz
Cores
2
4
Threads
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
BGA
LGA
Launched
Q1 2019
Q3 2015
L3 Cache
MB
6 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD E2-9030:
14%
Intel Core i5-6400:
32%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD E2-9030
1%
Intel Core i5-6400:
7%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD E2-9030: watts
0%
Intel Core i5-6400: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD E2-9030 : Q1 2019 ✅
Intel Core i5-6400 : Q3 2015 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD E2-9030
Intel Core i5-6400
Pro's and Con's
AMD E2-9030 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD E2-9030 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Core i5-6400's 73.80. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD E2-9030 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core i5-6400's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The AMD E2-9030 has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i5-6400's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD E2-9030 scores 983, which is lower than the Intel Core i5-6400's score of 5165. This makes the Intel Core i5-6400 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Intel Core i5-6400 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Core i5-6400 was launched more recently (Q3 2015) compared to the AMD E2-9030 (Q1 2019). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Core i5-6400 has a higher base clock speed of 2.7 GHz compared to the AMD E2-9030's 2.0 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Core i5-6400 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.3 GHz compared to the AMD E2-9030's 2.2 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1954, the Intel Core i5-6400 outperforms the AMD E2-9030 (score: 860). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i5-6400 features a larger L3 cache of 6MB compared to the AMD E2-9030's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core i5-6400 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the AMD E2-9030's W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
AMD E2-9030
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Core i5-6400
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD E2-9030
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Core i5-6400
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD E2-9030
The AMD E2-9030 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Core i5-6400
The Intel Core i5-6400 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
