Comparison between AMD FX-4320 and AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD FX-4320 has a higher base speed of 4.0 GHz compared to AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's 2.7 GHz.
AMD FX-4320 has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4).
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core supports more threads (4) compared to AMD FX-4320's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD FX-4320 uses the AM3+ socket, while AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core uses the FM1 socket.
AMD FX-4320 was launched in Q1 2016, while AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core was launched in Q2 2015.
AMD FX-4320 has a larger L3 cache of 4 MB compared to AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD FX-4320 and AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD FX-4320 has a base speed of 4.0 GHz, while the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core runs at 2.7 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD FX-4320 supports a turbo speed of 4.2 GHz, compared to GHz for the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core.
Cores: The AMD FX-4320 has 4 cores, while the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD FX-4320 supports threads, compared to 4 threads for the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD FX-4320 uses the AM3+, while the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core uses the FM1.
Launch Date: The AMD FX-4320 was launched on Q1 2016, while the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core was released on Q2 2015.
L3 Cache: The AMD FX-4320 has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD FX-4320
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
4.0 GHz
2.7 GHz
Turbo
4.2 GHz
GHz
Cores
4
4
Threads
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM3+
FM1
Launched
Q1 2016
Q2 2015
L3 Cache
4 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD FX-4320:
26%
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core:
19%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD FX-4320
4%
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core:
3%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD FX-4320: 95 watts
23.75%
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD FX-4320 : Q1 2016 ✅
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core : Q2 2015 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD FX-4320
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
Pro's and Con's
AMD FX-4320 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD FX-4320 has a higher base clock speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's 2.7 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD FX-4320 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1564, the AMD FX-4320 outperforms the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core (score: 1163). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD FX-4320 features a larger L3 cache of 4MB compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD FX-4320 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's 35.79. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD FX-4320 has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD FX-4320 has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core was launched more recently (Q2 2015) compared to the AMD FX-4320 (Q1 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Cons:
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core scores 2250, which is lower than the AMD FX-4320's score of 3150. This makes the AMD FX-4320 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD FX-4320
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD FX-4320
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD FX-4320
The AMD FX-4320 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
The AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
