🚀 CPU Launch

Home » Compare » AMD-FX-4320-vs-AMD-Athlon-X4-860K

AMD FX-4320 vs AMD Athlon X4 860K

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between AMD FX-4320 and AMD Athlon X4 860K

Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD. AMD FX-4320 has a higher base speed of 4.0 GHz compared to AMD Athlon X4 860K's 3.7 GHz. AMD FX-4320 has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to AMD Athlon X4 860K's 4.0 GHz. Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4). Both CPUs support the same number of threads ().

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. AMD FX-4320 uses the AM3+ socket, while AMD Athlon X4 860K uses the FM2+ socket. AMD FX-4320 was launched in Q1 2016, while AMD Athlon X4 860K was launched in Q3 2014. AMD FX-4320 has a larger L3 cache of 4 MB compared to AMD Athlon X4 860K's MB.

Specification Summary

The AMD FX-4320 and AMD Athlon X4 860K are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
  • Speed: The AMD FX-4320 has a base speed of 4.0 GHz, while the AMD Athlon X4 860K runs at 3.7 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The AMD FX-4320 supports a turbo speed of 4.2 GHz, compared to 4.0 GHz for the AMD Athlon X4 860K.
  • Cores: The AMD FX-4320 has 4 cores, while the AMD Athlon X4 860K has 4 cores.
  • Threads: The AMD FX-4320 supports threads, compared to threads for the AMD Athlon X4 860K.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The AMD FX-4320 uses the AM3+, while the AMD Athlon X4 860K uses the FM2+.
  • Launch Date: The AMD FX-4320 was launched on Q1 2016, while the AMD Athlon X4 860K was released on Q3 2014.
  • L3 Cache: The AMD FX-4320 has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Athlon X4 860K.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs AMD FX-4320 AMD Athlon X4 860K
AMD AMD
Manufacturer AMD AMD
Speed 4.0 GHz 3.7 GHz
Turbo 4.2 GHz 4.0 GHz
Cores 4 4
Threads
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket AM3+ FM2+
Launched Q1 2016 Q3 2014
L3 Cache 4 MB MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

AMD FX-4320:



26%
AMD Athlon X4 860K:
25%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

AMD FX-4320



4%
AMD Athlon X4 860K:
4%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

AMD FX-4320: 95 watts



23.75%
AMD Athlon X4 860K: 95 watts
23.75%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


AMD FX-4320 : Q1 2016 ✅

AMD Athlon X4 860K : Q3 2014 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

AMD FX-4320



AMD Athlon X4 860K


Pro's and Con's

AMD FX-4320 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD FX-4320 has a higher base clock speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon X4 860K's 3.7 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
  • Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD FX-4320 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon X4 860K's 4.0 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1564, the AMD FX-4320 outperforms the AMD Athlon X4 860K (score: 1528). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
  • Larger L3 Cache: The AMD FX-4320 features a larger L3 cache of 4MB compared to the AMD Athlon X4 860K's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
  • Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD FX-4320 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Athlon X4 860K's 247.57. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD FX-4320 scores 3150, which is lower than the AMD Athlon X4 860K's score of 3431. This makes the AMD Athlon X4 860K a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.

AMD Athlon X4 860K – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The AMD Athlon X4 860K was launched more recently (Q3 2014) compared to the AMD FX-4320 (Q1 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.

Cons:

  • Not available


Productivity


AMD FX-4320
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

AMD Athlon X4 860K
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

AMD FX-4320
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

AMD Athlon X4 860K
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.



Verdict

AMD FX-4320

The AMD FX-4320 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

AMD Athlon X4 860K

The AMD Athlon X4 860K is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.