🚀 CPU Launch

Home » Compare » AMD-FX-4320-vs-Intel-Celeron-J3160

AMD FX-4320 vs Intel Celeron J3160

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between AMD FX-4320 and Intel Celeron J3160

AMD FX-4320 is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Celeron J3160 is manufactured by Intel. AMD FX-4320 has a higher base speed of 4.0 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J3160's 1.6 GHz. AMD FX-4320 has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J3160's 2.2 GHz. Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4). Intel Celeron J3160 supports more threads (4) compared to AMD FX-4320's threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. AMD FX-4320 uses the AM3+ socket, while Intel Celeron J3160 uses the BGA1170 socket. AMD FX-4320 was launched in Q1 2016, while Intel Celeron J3160 was launched in Q2 2016. AMD FX-4320 has a larger L3 cache of 4 MB compared to Intel Celeron J3160's MB.

Specification Summary

The AMD FX-4320 and Intel Celeron J3160 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
  • Speed: The AMD FX-4320 has a base speed of 4.0 GHz, while the Intel Celeron J3160 runs at 1.6 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The AMD FX-4320 supports a turbo speed of 4.2 GHz, compared to 2.2 GHz for the Intel Celeron J3160.
  • Cores: The AMD FX-4320 has 4 cores, while the Intel Celeron J3160 has 4 cores.
  • Threads: The AMD FX-4320 supports threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Celeron J3160.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The AMD FX-4320 uses the AM3+, while the Intel Celeron J3160 uses the BGA1170.
  • Launch Date: The AMD FX-4320 was launched on Q1 2016, while the Intel Celeron J3160 was released on Q2 2016.
  • L3 Cache: The AMD FX-4320 has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the Intel Celeron J3160.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs AMD FX-4320 Intel Celeron J3160
AMD Intel
Manufacturer AMD Intel
Speed 4.0 GHz 1.6 GHz
Turbo 4.2 GHz 2.2 GHz
Cores 4 4
Threads 4
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket AM3+ BGA1170
Launched Q1 2016 Q2 2016
L3 Cache 4 MB MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

AMD FX-4320:



26%
Intel Celeron J3160:
10%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

AMD FX-4320



4%
Intel Celeron J3160:
1%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

AMD FX-4320: 95 watts



23.75%
Intel Celeron J3160: 6 watts
1.5%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


AMD FX-4320 : Q1 2016 ✅

Intel Celeron J3160 : Q2 2016 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

AMD FX-4320



Intel Celeron J3160


Pro's and Con's

AMD FX-4320 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD FX-4320 has a higher base clock speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J3160's 1.6 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
  • Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD FX-4320 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J3160's 2.2 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1564, the AMD FX-4320 outperforms the Intel Celeron J3160 (score: 605). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
  • Larger L3 Cache: The AMD FX-4320 features a larger L3 cache of 4MB compared to the Intel Celeron J3160's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.

Cons:

  • Fewer Threads: The AMD FX-4320 has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron J3160's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
  • Higher Power Consumption: The AMD FX-4320 has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the Intel Celeron J3160's 6W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.

Intel Celeron J3160 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The Intel Celeron J3160 was launched more recently (Q2 2016) compared to the AMD FX-4320 (Q1 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.

Cons:

  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron J3160 scores 1271, which is lower than the AMD FX-4320's score of 3150. This makes the AMD FX-4320 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.


Productivity


AMD FX-4320
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Intel Celeron J3160
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

AMD FX-4320
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

Intel Celeron J3160
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.



Verdict

AMD FX-4320

The AMD FX-4320 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

Intel Celeron J3160

The Intel Celeron J3160 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.