Comparison between AMD FX-4330 and Intel Celeron G1620T
AMD FX-4330 is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Celeron G1620T is manufactured by Intel.
AMD FX-4330 has a higher base speed of 4.0 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G1620T's 2.4 GHz.
AMD FX-4330 has a higher turbo speed of 4.1 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G1620T's GHz.
AMD FX-4330 has more cores (4) compared to Intel Celeron G1620T's 2 cores.
Intel Celeron G1620T supports more threads (2) compared to AMD FX-4330's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD FX-4330 uses the AM3+ socket, while Intel Celeron G1620T uses the LGA1155 socket.
AMD FX-4330 was launched in Q4 2015, while Intel Celeron G1620T was launched in Q1 2014.
AMD FX-4330 has a larger L3 cache of 8 MB compared to Intel Celeron G1620T's 2 MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD FX-4330 and Intel Celeron G1620T are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD FX-4330 has a base speed of 4.0 GHz, while the Intel Celeron G1620T runs at 2.4 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD FX-4330 supports a turbo speed of 4.1 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Celeron G1620T.
Cores: The AMD FX-4330 has 4 cores, while the Intel Celeron G1620T has 2 cores.
Threads: The AMD FX-4330 supports threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron G1620T.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD FX-4330 uses the AM3+, while the Intel Celeron G1620T uses the LGA1155.
Launch Date: The AMD FX-4330 was launched on Q4 2015, while the Intel Celeron G1620T was released on Q1 2014.
L3 Cache: The AMD FX-4330 has 8 MB of L3 cache, compared to 2 MB for the Intel Celeron G1620T.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD FX-4330
Intel Celeron G1620T
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
4.0 GHz
2.4 GHz
Turbo
4.1 GHz
GHz
Cores
4
2
Threads
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM3+
LGA1155
Launched
Q4 2015
Q1 2014
L3 Cache
8 MB
2 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD FX-4330:
26%
Intel Celeron G1620T:
22%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD FX-4330
4%
Intel Celeron G1620T:
2%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD FX-4330: 95 watts
23.75%
Intel Celeron G1620T: 35 watts
8.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD FX-4330 : Q4 2015 ✅
Intel Celeron G1620T : Q1 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD FX-4330
Intel Celeron G1620T
Pro's and Con's
AMD FX-4330 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD FX-4330 was launched more recently (Q4 2015) compared to the Intel Celeron G1620T (Q1 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD FX-4330 has a higher base clock speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G1620T's 2.4 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD FX-4330 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.1 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G1620T's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1563, the AMD FX-4330 outperforms the Intel Celeron G1620T (score: 1327). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD FX-4330 features a larger L3 cache of 8MB compared to the Intel Celeron G1620T's 2MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD FX-4330 has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron G1620T's 2 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD FX-4330 has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the Intel Celeron G1620T's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Celeron G1620T – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron G1620T has a higher CPU Mark score of 36.48 compared to the AMD FX-4330's 4.29. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron G1620T has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD FX-4330's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron G1620T scores 1532, which is lower than the AMD FX-4330's score of 3146. This makes the AMD FX-4330 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD FX-4330
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Celeron G1620T
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD FX-4330
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Celeron G1620T
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD FX-4330
The AMD FX-4330 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Celeron G1620T
The Intel Celeron G1620T is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
