Comparison between AMD FX-6330 Six-Core and AMD Athlon X4 840
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core has a higher base speed of 3.6 GHz compared to AMD Athlon X4 840's 3.1 GHz.
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to AMD Athlon X4 840's 3.8 GHz.
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core has more cores (6) compared to AMD Athlon X4 840's 4 cores.
Both CPUs support the same number of threads ().
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core uses the AM3+ socket, while AMD Athlon X4 840 uses the FM2+ socket.
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core was launched in Q4 2016, while AMD Athlon X4 840 was launched in Q1 2015.
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core has a larger L3 cache of 8 MB compared to AMD Athlon X4 840's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD FX-6330 Six-Core and AMD Athlon X4 840 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD FX-6330 Six-Core has a base speed of 3.6 GHz, while the AMD Athlon X4 840 runs at 3.1 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD FX-6330 Six-Core supports a turbo speed of 4.2 GHz, compared to 3.8 GHz for the AMD Athlon X4 840.
Cores: The AMD FX-6330 Six-Core has 6 cores, while the AMD Athlon X4 840 has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD FX-6330 Six-Core supports threads, compared to threads for the AMD Athlon X4 840.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD FX-6330 Six-Core uses the AM3+, while the AMD Athlon X4 840 uses the FM2+.
Launch Date: The AMD FX-6330 Six-Core was launched on Q4 2016, while the AMD Athlon X4 840 was released on Q1 2015.
L3 Cache: The AMD FX-6330 Six-Core has 8 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Athlon X4 840.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core
AMD Athlon X4 840
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Turbo
4.2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Cores
6
4
Threads
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM3+
FM2+
Launched
Q4 2016
Q1 2015
L3 Cache
8 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core:
25%
AMD Athlon X4 840:
24%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core
6%
AMD Athlon X4 840:
4%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core: 95 watts
23.75%
AMD Athlon X4 840: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core : Q4 2016 ✅
AMD Athlon X4 840 : Q1 2015 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core
AMD Athlon X4 840
Pro's and Con's
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD FX-6330 Six-Core was launched more recently (Q4 2016) compared to the AMD Athlon X4 840 (Q1 2015). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD FX-6330 Six-Core has a higher base clock speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon X4 840's 3.1 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD FX-6330 Six-Core supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon X4 840's 3.8 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1531, the AMD FX-6330 Six-Core outperforms the AMD Athlon X4 840 (score: 1488). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD FX-6330 Six-Core features a larger L3 cache of 8MB compared to the AMD Athlon X4 840's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD FX-6330 Six-Core has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Athlon X4 840's 26.55. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD FX-6330 Six-Core has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the AMD Athlon X4 840's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
AMD Athlon X4 840 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Not available
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Athlon X4 840 has 4 cores, which is fewer than the AMD FX-6330 Six-Core's 6 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon X4 840 scores 3318, which is lower than the AMD FX-6330 Six-Core's score of 4433. This makes the AMD FX-6330 Six-Core a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Athlon X4 840
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Athlon X4 840
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core
The AMD FX-6330 Six-Core is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Athlon X4 840
The AMD Athlon X4 840 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
