Comparison between AMD FX-770K Quad-Core and Intel Celeron J1800
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Celeron J1800 is manufactured by Intel.
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core has a higher base speed of 3.5 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J1800's 2.4 GHz.
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core has a higher turbo speed of 3.9 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J1800's 2.6 GHz.
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core has more cores (4) compared to Intel Celeron J1800's 2 cores.
Intel Celeron J1800 supports more threads (2) compared to AMD FX-770K Quad-Core's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core uses the FM2+ socket, while Intel Celeron J1800 uses the FCBGA1170 socket.
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core was launched in Q4 2014, while Intel Celeron J1800 was launched in Q1 2014.
Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD FX-770K Quad-Core and Intel Celeron J1800 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD FX-770K Quad-Core has a base speed of 3.5 GHz, while the Intel Celeron J1800 runs at 2.4 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD FX-770K Quad-Core supports a turbo speed of 3.9 GHz, compared to 2.6 GHz for the Intel Celeron J1800.
Cores: The AMD FX-770K Quad-Core has 4 cores, while the Intel Celeron J1800 has 2 cores.
Threads: The AMD FX-770K Quad-Core supports threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron J1800.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD FX-770K Quad-Core uses the FM2+, while the Intel Celeron J1800 uses the FCBGA1170.
Launch Date: The AMD FX-770K Quad-Core was launched on Q4 2014, while the Intel Celeron J1800 was released on Q1 2014.
L3 Cache: The AMD FX-770K Quad-Core has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the Intel Celeron J1800.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core
Intel Celeron J1800
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
3.5 GHz
2.4 GHz
Turbo
3.9 GHz
2.6 GHz
Cores
4
2
Threads
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FM2+
FCBGA1170
Launched
Q4 2014
Q1 2014
L3 Cache
MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core:
24%
Intel Celeron J1800:
10%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core
4%
Intel Celeron J1800:
0%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core: 65 watts
16.25%
Intel Celeron J1800: 10 watts
2.5%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core : Q4 2014 ✅
Intel Celeron J1800 : Q1 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core
Intel Celeron J1800
Pro's and Con's
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD FX-770K Quad-Core was launched more recently (Q4 2014) compared to the Intel Celeron J1800 (Q1 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD FX-770K Quad-Core has a higher base clock speed of 3.5 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J1800's 2.4 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD FX-770K Quad-Core supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.9 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J1800's 2.6 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1468, the AMD FX-770K Quad-Core outperforms the Intel Celeron J1800 (score: 658). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD FX-770K Quad-Core has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron J1800's 2 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD FX-770K Quad-Core has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron J1800's 10W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Celeron J1800 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Not available
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron J1800 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD FX-770K Quad-Core's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron J1800 scores 573, which is lower than the AMD FX-770K Quad-Core's score of 3060. This makes the AMD FX-770K Quad-Core a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Celeron J1800
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Celeron J1800
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core
The AMD FX-770K Quad-Core is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Celeron J1800
The Intel Celeron J1800 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
