Comparison between AMD FirePro A320 APU and AMD Athlon II X4 655
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD FirePro A320 APU has a higher base speed of 3.8 GHz compared to AMD Athlon II X4 655's 3.3 GHz.
AMD FirePro A320 APU has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to AMD Athlon II X4 655's GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4).
AMD Athlon II X4 655 supports more threads (4) compared to AMD FirePro A320 APU's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD FirePro A320 APU uses the FM2 socket, while AMD Athlon II X4 655 uses the AM2+ socket.
AMD FirePro A320 APU was launched in Q3 2016, while AMD Athlon II X4 655 was launched in Q1 2014.
Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD FirePro A320 APU and AMD Athlon II X4 655 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD FirePro A320 APU has a base speed of 3.8 GHz, while the AMD Athlon II X4 655 runs at 3.3 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD FirePro A320 APU supports a turbo speed of 4.2 GHz, compared to GHz for the AMD Athlon II X4 655.
Cores: The AMD FirePro A320 APU has 4 cores, while the AMD Athlon II X4 655 has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD FirePro A320 APU supports threads, compared to 4 threads for the AMD Athlon II X4 655.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD FirePro A320 APU uses the FM2, while the AMD Athlon II X4 655 uses the AM2+.
Launch Date: The AMD FirePro A320 APU was launched on Q3 2016, while the AMD Athlon II X4 655 was released on Q1 2014.
L3 Cache: The AMD FirePro A320 APU has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Athlon II X4 655.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD FirePro A320 APU
AMD Athlon II X4 655
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.8 GHz
3.3 GHz
Turbo
4.2 GHz
GHz
Cores
4
4
Threads
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FM2
AM2+
Launched
Q3 2016
Q1 2014
L3 Cache
MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD FirePro A320 APU:
19%
AMD Athlon II X4 655:
24%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD FirePro A320 APU
3%
AMD Athlon II X4 655:
3%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD FirePro A320 APU: 100 watts
25%
AMD Athlon II X4 655: 95 watts
23.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD FirePro A320 APU : Q3 2016 ✅
AMD Athlon II X4 655 : Q1 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD FirePro A320 APU
AMD Athlon II X4 655
Pro's and Con's
AMD FirePro A320 APU – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD FirePro A320 APU was launched more recently (Q3 2016) compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 655 (Q1 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD FirePro A320 APU has a higher base clock speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 655's 3.3 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD FirePro A320 APU supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 655's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD FirePro A320 APU has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon II X4 655's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD FirePro A320 APU has a higher TDP of 100W compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 655's 95W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
AMD Athlon II X4 655 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1473, the AMD Athlon II X4 655 outperforms the AMD FirePro A320 APU (score: 1193). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Cons:
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon II X4 655 scores 2078, which is lower than the AMD FirePro A320 APU's score of 2153. This makes the AMD FirePro A320 APU a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD FirePro A320 APU
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Athlon II X4 655
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD FirePro A320 APU
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Athlon II X4 655
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD FirePro A320 APU
The AMD FirePro A320 APU is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Athlon II X4 655
The AMD Athlon II X4 655 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
