Comparison between AMD PRO A10-8770 and AMD FX-6330 Six-Core
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core has a higher base speed of 3.6 GHz compared to AMD PRO A10-8770's 3.5 GHz.
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to AMD PRO A10-8770's 3.8 GHz.
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core has more cores (6) compared to AMD PRO A10-8770's 4 cores.
Both CPUs support the same number of threads ().
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD PRO A10-8770 uses the AM4 socket, while AMD FX-6330 Six-Core uses the AM3+ socket.
AMD PRO A10-8770 was launched in Q1 2017, while AMD FX-6330 Six-Core was launched in Q4 2016.
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core has a larger L3 cache of 8 MB compared to AMD PRO A10-8770's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD PRO A10-8770 and AMD FX-6330 Six-Core are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD PRO A10-8770 has a base speed of 3.5 GHz, while the AMD FX-6330 Six-Core runs at 3.6 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD PRO A10-8770 supports a turbo speed of 3.8 GHz, compared to 4.2 GHz for the AMD FX-6330 Six-Core.
Cores: The AMD PRO A10-8770 has 4 cores, while the AMD FX-6330 Six-Core has 6 cores.
Threads: The AMD PRO A10-8770 supports threads, compared to threads for the AMD FX-6330 Six-Core.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD PRO A10-8770 uses the AM4, while the AMD FX-6330 Six-Core uses the AM3+.
Launch Date: The AMD PRO A10-8770 was launched on Q1 2017, while the AMD FX-6330 Six-Core was released on Q4 2016.
L3 Cache: The AMD PRO A10-8770 has MB of L3 cache, compared to 8 MB for the AMD FX-6330 Six-Core.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD PRO A10-8770
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Turbo
3.8 GHz
4.2 GHz
Cores
4
6
Threads
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
AM3+
Launched
Q1 2017
Q4 2016
L3 Cache
MB
8 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD PRO A10-8770:
26%
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core:
25%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD PRO A10-8770
5%
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core:
6%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD PRO A10-8770: 65 watts
16.25%
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core: 95 watts
23.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD PRO A10-8770 : Q1 2017 ✅
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core : Q4 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD PRO A10-8770
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core
Pro's and Con's
AMD PRO A10-8770 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1596, the AMD PRO A10-8770 outperforms the AMD FX-6330 Six-Core (score: 1531). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD PRO A10-8770 has 4 cores, which is fewer than the AMD FX-6330 Six-Core's 6 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD PRO A10-8770 scores 3574, which is lower than the AMD FX-6330 Six-Core's score of 4433. This makes the AMD FX-6330 Six-Core a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD FX-6330 Six-Core was launched more recently (Q4 2016) compared to the AMD PRO A10-8770 (Q1 2017). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD FX-6330 Six-Core has a higher base clock speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the AMD PRO A10-8770's 3.5 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD FX-6330 Six-Core supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the AMD PRO A10-8770's 3.8 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD FX-6330 Six-Core features a larger L3 cache of 8MB compared to the AMD PRO A10-8770's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD FX-6330 Six-Core has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the AMD PRO A10-8770's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
AMD PRO A10-8770
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD PRO A10-8770
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD PRO A10-8770
The AMD PRO A10-8770 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core
The AMD FX-6330 Six-Core is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
