🚀 CPU Launch

Home » Compare » AMD-PRO-A10-8770E-vs-AMD-FirePro-A320-APU

AMD PRO A10-8770E vs AMD FirePro A320 APU

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between AMD PRO A10-8770E and AMD FirePro A320 APU

Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD. AMD FirePro A320 APU has a higher base speed of 3.8 GHz compared to AMD PRO A10-8770E's 2.8 GHz. AMD FirePro A320 APU has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to AMD PRO A10-8770E's 3.5 GHz. Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4). Both CPUs support the same number of threads ().

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. AMD PRO A10-8770E uses the AM4 socket, while AMD FirePro A320 APU uses the FM2 socket. AMD PRO A10-8770E was launched in Q1 2017, while AMD FirePro A320 APU was launched in Q3 2016. Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.

Specification Summary

The AMD PRO A10-8770E and AMD FirePro A320 APU are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
  • Speed: The AMD PRO A10-8770E has a base speed of 2.8 GHz, while the AMD FirePro A320 APU runs at 3.8 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The AMD PRO A10-8770E supports a turbo speed of 3.5 GHz, compared to 4.2 GHz for the AMD FirePro A320 APU.
  • Cores: The AMD PRO A10-8770E has 4 cores, while the AMD FirePro A320 APU has 4 cores.
  • Threads: The AMD PRO A10-8770E supports threads, compared to threads for the AMD FirePro A320 APU.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The AMD PRO A10-8770E uses the AM4, while the AMD FirePro A320 APU uses the FM2.
  • Launch Date: The AMD PRO A10-8770E was launched on Q1 2017, while the AMD FirePro A320 APU was released on Q3 2016.
  • L3 Cache: The AMD PRO A10-8770E has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD FirePro A320 APU.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs AMD PRO A10-8770E AMD FirePro A320 APU
AMD AMD
Manufacturer AMD AMD
Speed 2.8 GHz 3.8 GHz
Turbo 3.5 GHz 4.2 GHz
Cores 4 4
Threads
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket AM4 FM2
Launched Q1 2017 Q3 2016
L3 Cache MB MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

AMD PRO A10-8770E:



24%
AMD FirePro A320 APU:
19%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

AMD PRO A10-8770E



4%
AMD FirePro A320 APU:
3%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

AMD PRO A10-8770E: 35 watts



8.75%
AMD FirePro A320 APU: 100 watts
25%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


AMD PRO A10-8770E : Q1 2017 ✅

AMD FirePro A320 APU : Q3 2016 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

AMD PRO A10-8770E



AMD FirePro A320 APU


Pro's and Con's

AMD PRO A10-8770E – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1450, the AMD PRO A10-8770E outperforms the AMD FirePro A320 APU (score: 1193). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.

Cons:

  • Not available

AMD FirePro A320 APU – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The AMD FirePro A320 APU was launched more recently (Q3 2016) compared to the AMD PRO A10-8770E (Q1 2017). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD FirePro A320 APU has a higher base clock speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the AMD PRO A10-8770E's 2.8 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
  • Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD FirePro A320 APU supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the AMD PRO A10-8770E's 3.5 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.

Cons:

  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD FirePro A320 APU scores 2153, which is lower than the AMD PRO A10-8770E's score of 3037. This makes the AMD PRO A10-8770E a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
  • Higher Power Consumption: The AMD FirePro A320 APU has a higher TDP of 100W compared to the AMD PRO A10-8770E's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.


Productivity


AMD PRO A10-8770E
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

AMD FirePro A320 APU
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

AMD PRO A10-8770E
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

AMD FirePro A320 APU
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.



Verdict

AMD PRO A10-8770E

The AMD PRO A10-8770E is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

AMD FirePro A320 APU

The AMD FirePro A320 APU is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.