Comparison between AMD PRO A10-8770E and AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 has a higher base speed of 3.2 GHz compared to AMD PRO A10-8770E's 2.8 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 has a higher turbo speed of 3.6 GHz compared to AMD PRO A10-8770E's 3.5 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 has more cores (6) compared to AMD PRO A10-8770E's 4 cores.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 supports more threads (12) compared to AMD PRO A10-8770E's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Both CPUs use the same socket type: AM4.
Both CPUs were launched in the same year: Q1 2017.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 has a larger L3 cache of 16 MB compared to AMD PRO A10-8770E's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD PRO A10-8770E and AMD Ryzen 5 1600 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD PRO A10-8770E has a base speed of 2.8 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 runs at 3.2 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD PRO A10-8770E supports a turbo speed of 3.5 GHz, compared to 3.6 GHz for the AMD Ryzen 5 1600.
Cores: The AMD PRO A10-8770E has 4 cores, while the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 has 6 cores.
Threads: The AMD PRO A10-8770E supports threads, compared to 12 threads for the AMD Ryzen 5 1600.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD PRO A10-8770E uses the AM4, while the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The AMD PRO A10-8770E was launched on Q1 2017, while the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 was released on Q1 2017.
L3 Cache: The AMD PRO A10-8770E has MB of L3 cache, compared to 16 MB for the AMD Ryzen 5 1600.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD PRO A10-8770E
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
2.8 GHz
3.2 GHz
Turbo
3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Cores
4
6
Threads
12
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
AM4
Launched
Q1 2017
Q1 2017
L3 Cache
MB
16 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD PRO A10-8770E:
24%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600:
34%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD PRO A10-8770E
4%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600:
17%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD PRO A10-8770E: 35 watts
8.75%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD PRO A10-8770E : Q1 2017 ✅
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 : Q1 2017 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD PRO A10-8770E
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Pro's and Con's
AMD PRO A10-8770E – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD PRO A10-8770E has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 1600's 204.67. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD PRO A10-8770E has 4 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 1600's 6 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The AMD PRO A10-8770E has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 1600's 12 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD PRO A10-8770E scores 3037, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 1600's score of 12278. This makes the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 1600 has a higher base clock speed of 3.2 GHz compared to the AMD PRO A10-8770E's 2.8 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 1600 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the AMD PRO A10-8770E's 3.5 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2066, the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms the AMD PRO A10-8770E (score: 1450). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 1600 features a larger L3 cache of 16MB compared to the AMD PRO A10-8770E's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 5 1600 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the AMD PRO A10-8770E's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
AMD PRO A10-8770E
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD PRO A10-8770E
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD PRO A10-8770E
The AMD PRO A10-8770E is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
The AMD Ryzen 5 1600 is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
