Comparison between AMD PRO A10-8770E and Intel Celeron G3950
AMD PRO A10-8770E is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Celeron G3950 is manufactured by Intel.
Intel Celeron G3950 has a higher base speed of 3.0 GHz compared to AMD PRO A10-8770E's 2.8 GHz.
AMD PRO A10-8770E has a higher turbo speed of 3.5 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G3950's GHz.
AMD PRO A10-8770E has more cores (4) compared to Intel Celeron G3950's 2 cores.
Intel Celeron G3950 supports more threads (2) compared to AMD PRO A10-8770E's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD PRO A10-8770E uses the AM4 socket, while Intel Celeron G3950 uses the FCLGA1151 socket.
Both CPUs were launched in the same year: Q1 2017.
Intel Celeron G3950 has a larger L3 cache of 2 MB compared to AMD PRO A10-8770E's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD PRO A10-8770E and Intel Celeron G3950 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD PRO A10-8770E has a base speed of 2.8 GHz, while the Intel Celeron G3950 runs at 3.0 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD PRO A10-8770E supports a turbo speed of 3.5 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Celeron G3950.
Cores: The AMD PRO A10-8770E has 4 cores, while the Intel Celeron G3950 has 2 cores.
Threads: The AMD PRO A10-8770E supports threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron G3950.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD PRO A10-8770E uses the AM4, while the Intel Celeron G3950 uses the FCLGA1151.
Launch Date: The AMD PRO A10-8770E was launched on Q1 2017, while the Intel Celeron G3950 was released on Q1 2017.
L3 Cache: The AMD PRO A10-8770E has MB of L3 cache, compared to 2 MB for the Intel Celeron G3950.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD PRO A10-8770E
Intel Celeron G3950
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
2.8 GHz
3.0 GHz
Turbo
3.5 GHz
GHz
Cores
4
2
Threads
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
FCLGA1151
Launched
Q1 2017
Q1 2017
L3 Cache
MB
2 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD PRO A10-8770E:
24%
Intel Celeron G3950:
30%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD PRO A10-8770E
4%
Intel Celeron G3950:
3%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD PRO A10-8770E: 35 watts
8.75%
Intel Celeron G3950: 51 watts
12.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD PRO A10-8770E : Q1 2017 ✅
Intel Celeron G3950 : Q1 2017 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD PRO A10-8770E
Intel Celeron G3950
Pro's and Con's
AMD PRO A10-8770E – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD PRO A10-8770E supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.5 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G3950's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD PRO A10-8770E has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Celeron G3950's 16.24. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD PRO A10-8770E has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron G3950's 2 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Intel Celeron G3950 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Celeron G3950 has a higher base clock speed of 3.0 GHz compared to the AMD PRO A10-8770E's 2.8 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1851, the Intel Celeron G3950 outperforms the AMD PRO A10-8770E (score: 1450). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G3950 features a larger L3 cache of 2MB compared to the AMD PRO A10-8770E's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron G3950 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD PRO A10-8770E's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron G3950 scores 2322, which is lower than the AMD PRO A10-8770E's score of 3037. This makes the AMD PRO A10-8770E a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Celeron G3950 has a higher TDP of 51W compared to the AMD PRO A10-8770E's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
AMD PRO A10-8770E
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Celeron G3950
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD PRO A10-8770E
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Celeron G3950
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD PRO A10-8770E
The AMD PRO A10-8770E is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Celeron G3950
The Intel Celeron G3950 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
