Comparison between AMD PRO A10-9700 and Intel Atom E3815
AMD PRO A10-9700 is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Atom E3815 is manufactured by Intel.
AMD PRO A10-9700 has a higher base speed of 3.5 GHz compared to Intel Atom E3815's 1.5 GHz.
AMD PRO A10-9700 has a higher turbo speed of 3.8 GHz compared to Intel Atom E3815's GHz.
AMD PRO A10-9700 has more cores (4) compared to Intel Atom E3815's 1 cores.
Intel Atom E3815 supports more threads (1) compared to AMD PRO A10-9700's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD PRO A10-9700 uses the AM4 socket, while Intel Atom E3815 uses the FCBGA1170 socket.
AMD PRO A10-9700 was launched in Q4 2016, while Intel Atom E3815 was launched in Q2 2014.
Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD PRO A10-9700 and Intel Atom E3815 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD PRO A10-9700 has a base speed of 3.5 GHz, while the Intel Atom E3815 runs at 1.5 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD PRO A10-9700 supports a turbo speed of 3.8 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Atom E3815.
Cores: The AMD PRO A10-9700 has 4 cores, while the Intel Atom E3815 has 1 cores.
Threads: The AMD PRO A10-9700 supports threads, compared to 1 threads for the Intel Atom E3815.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD PRO A10-9700 uses the AM4, while the Intel Atom E3815 uses the FCBGA1170.
Launch Date: The AMD PRO A10-9700 was launched on Q4 2016, while the Intel Atom E3815 was released on Q2 2014.
L3 Cache: The AMD PRO A10-9700 has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the Intel Atom E3815.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD PRO A10-9700
Intel Atom E3815
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
3.5 GHz
1.5 GHz
Turbo
3.8 GHz
GHz
Cores
4
1
Threads
1
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
FCBGA1170
Launched
Q4 2016
Q2 2014
L3 Cache
MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD PRO A10-9700:
27%
Intel Atom E3815:
4%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD PRO A10-9700
5%
Intel Atom E3815:
0%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD PRO A10-9700: 65 watts
16.25%
Intel Atom E3815: 5 watts
1.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD PRO A10-9700 : Q4 2016 ✅
Intel Atom E3815 : Q2 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD PRO A10-9700
Intel Atom E3815
Pro's and Con's
AMD PRO A10-9700 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD PRO A10-9700 was launched more recently (Q4 2016) compared to the Intel Atom E3815 (Q2 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD PRO A10-9700 has a higher base clock speed of 3.5 GHz compared to the Intel Atom E3815's 1.5 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD PRO A10-9700 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the Intel Atom E3815's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1640, the AMD PRO A10-9700 outperforms the Intel Atom E3815 (score: 266). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD PRO A10-9700 has a higher CPU Mark score of 21.53 compared to the Intel Atom E3815's 1.36. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD PRO A10-9700 has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Atom E3815's 1 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD PRO A10-9700 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Atom E3815's 5W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Atom E3815 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Not available
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Atom E3815 has 1 cores, which is fewer than the AMD PRO A10-9700's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Atom E3815 scores 184, which is lower than the AMD PRO A10-9700's score of 3639. This makes the AMD PRO A10-9700 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD PRO A10-9700
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Atom E3815
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD PRO A10-9700
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Atom E3815
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD PRO A10-9700
The AMD PRO A10-9700 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Atom E3815
The Intel Atom E3815 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
