🚀 CPU Launch

AMD PRO A10-9700E vs AMD Athlon X4 840

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between AMD PRO A10-9700E and AMD Athlon X4 840

Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD. AMD Athlon X4 840 has a higher base speed of 3.1 GHz compared to AMD PRO A10-9700E's 3.0 GHz. AMD Athlon X4 840 has a higher turbo speed of 3.8 GHz compared to AMD PRO A10-9700E's 3.5 GHz. Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4). Both CPUs support the same number of threads ().

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. AMD PRO A10-9700E uses the AM4 socket, while AMD Athlon X4 840 uses the FM2+ socket. AMD PRO A10-9700E was launched in Q3 2016, while AMD Athlon X4 840 was launched in Q1 2015. Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.

Specification Summary

The AMD PRO A10-9700E and AMD Athlon X4 840 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
  • Speed: The AMD PRO A10-9700E has a base speed of 3.0 GHz, while the AMD Athlon X4 840 runs at 3.1 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The AMD PRO A10-9700E supports a turbo speed of 3.5 GHz, compared to 3.8 GHz for the AMD Athlon X4 840.
  • Cores: The AMD PRO A10-9700E has 4 cores, while the AMD Athlon X4 840 has 4 cores.
  • Threads: The AMD PRO A10-9700E supports threads, compared to threads for the AMD Athlon X4 840.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The AMD PRO A10-9700E uses the AM4, while the AMD Athlon X4 840 uses the FM2+.
  • Launch Date: The AMD PRO A10-9700E was launched on Q3 2016, while the AMD Athlon X4 840 was released on Q1 2015.
  • L3 Cache: The AMD PRO A10-9700E has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Athlon X4 840.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs AMD PRO A10-9700E AMD Athlon X4 840
AMD AMD
Manufacturer AMD AMD
Speed 3.0 GHz 3.1 GHz
Turbo 3.5 GHz 3.8 GHz
Cores 4 4
Threads
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket AM4 FM2+
Launched Q3 2016 Q1 2015
L3 Cache MB MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

AMD PRO A10-9700E:



23%
AMD Athlon X4 840:
24%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

AMD PRO A10-9700E



4%
AMD Athlon X4 840:
4%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

AMD PRO A10-9700E: 35 watts



8.75%
AMD Athlon X4 840: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


AMD PRO A10-9700E : Q3 2016 ✅

AMD Athlon X4 840 : Q1 2015 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

AMD PRO A10-9700E



AMD Athlon X4 840


Pro's and Con's

AMD PRO A10-9700E – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The AMD PRO A10-9700E was launched more recently (Q3 2016) compared to the AMD Athlon X4 840 (Q1 2015). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.

Cons:

  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD PRO A10-9700E scores 2998, which is lower than the AMD Athlon X4 840's score of 3318. This makes the AMD Athlon X4 840 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.

AMD Athlon X4 840 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 840 has a higher base clock speed of 3.1 GHz compared to the AMD PRO A10-9700E's 3.0 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
  • Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 840 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the AMD PRO A10-9700E's 3.5 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1488, the AMD Athlon X4 840 outperforms the AMD PRO A10-9700E (score: 1427). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
  • Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Athlon X4 840 has a higher CPU Mark score of 26.55 compared to the AMD PRO A10-9700E's 21.57. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

  • Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Athlon X4 840 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the AMD PRO A10-9700E's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.


Productivity


AMD PRO A10-9700E
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

AMD Athlon X4 840
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

AMD PRO A10-9700E
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

AMD Athlon X4 840
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.



Verdict

AMD PRO A10-9700E

The AMD PRO A10-9700E is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

AMD Athlon X4 840

The AMD Athlon X4 840 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.