AMD PRO A12-8870 vs AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
Table of Contents
Overview:
Comparison between AMD PRO A12-8870 and AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD PRO A12-8870 has a higher base speed of 3.7 GHz compared to AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's 2.7 GHz.
AMD PRO A12-8870 has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4).
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core supports more threads (4) compared to AMD PRO A12-8870's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD PRO A12-8870 uses the AM4 socket, while AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core uses the FM1 socket.
AMD PRO A12-8870 was launched in Q1 2017, while AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core was launched in Q2 2015.
Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD PRO A12-8870 and AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD PRO A12-8870 has a base speed of 3.7 GHz, while the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core runs at 2.7 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD PRO A12-8870 supports a turbo speed of 4.2 GHz, compared to GHz for the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core.
Cores: The AMD PRO A12-8870 has 4 cores, while the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD PRO A12-8870 supports threads, compared to 4 threads for the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD PRO A12-8870 uses the AM4, while the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core uses the FM1.
Launch Date: The AMD PRO A12-8870 was launched on Q1 2017, while the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core was released on Q2 2015.
L3 Cache: The AMD PRO A12-8870 has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD PRO A12-8870
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.7 GHz
2.7 GHz
Turbo
4.2 GHz
GHz
Cores
4
4
Threads
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
FM1
Launched
Q1 2017
Q2 2015
L3 Cache
MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD PRO A12-8870:
29%
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core:
19%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD PRO A12-8870
5%
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core:
3%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD PRO A12-8870: 65 watts
16.25%
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD PRO A12-8870 : Q1 2017 ✅
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core : Q2 2015 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD PRO A12-8870
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
Pro's and Con's
AMD PRO A12-8870 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD PRO A12-8870 has a higher base clock speed of 3.7 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's 2.7 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD PRO A12-8870 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1784, the AMD PRO A12-8870 outperforms the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core (score: 1163). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD PRO A12-8870 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's 35.79. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD PRO A12-8870 has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core was launched more recently (Q2 2015) compared to the AMD PRO A12-8870 (Q1 2017). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Cons:
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core scores 2250, which is lower than the AMD PRO A12-8870's score of 3888. This makes the AMD PRO A12-8870 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD PRO A12-8870
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD PRO A12-8870
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD PRO A12-8870
The AMD PRO A12-8870 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
The AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
