Comparison between AMD PRO A12-8870E and Intel Celeron G3900
AMD PRO A12-8870E is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Celeron G3900 is manufactured by Intel.
AMD PRO A12-8870E has a higher base speed of 2.9 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G3900's 2.8 GHz.
AMD PRO A12-8870E has a higher turbo speed of 3.8 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G3900's GHz.
AMD PRO A12-8870E has more cores (4) compared to Intel Celeron G3900's 2 cores.
Intel Celeron G3900 supports more threads (2) compared to AMD PRO A12-8870E's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD PRO A12-8870E uses the AM4 socket, while Intel Celeron G3900 uses the FCLGA1151 socket.
AMD PRO A12-8870E was launched in Q4 2016, while Intel Celeron G3900 was launched in Q1 2016.
Intel Celeron G3900 has a larger L3 cache of 2 MB compared to AMD PRO A12-8870E's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD PRO A12-8870E and Intel Celeron G3900 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD PRO A12-8870E has a base speed of 2.9 GHz, while the Intel Celeron G3900 runs at 2.8 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD PRO A12-8870E supports a turbo speed of 3.8 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Celeron G3900.
Cores: The AMD PRO A12-8870E has 4 cores, while the Intel Celeron G3900 has 2 cores.
Threads: The AMD PRO A12-8870E supports threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron G3900.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD PRO A12-8870E uses the AM4, while the Intel Celeron G3900 uses the FCLGA1151.
Launch Date: The AMD PRO A12-8870E was launched on Q4 2016, while the Intel Celeron G3900 was released on Q1 2016.
L3 Cache: The AMD PRO A12-8870E has MB of L3 cache, compared to 2 MB for the Intel Celeron G3900.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD PRO A12-8870E
Intel Celeron G3900
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
2.9 GHz
2.8 GHz
Turbo
3.8 GHz
GHz
Cores
4
2
Threads
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
FCLGA1151
Launched
Q4 2016
Q1 2016
L3 Cache
MB
2 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD PRO A12-8870E:
24%
Intel Celeron G3900:
28%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD PRO A12-8870E
4%
Intel Celeron G3900:
3%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD PRO A12-8870E: 35 watts
8.75%
Intel Celeron G3900: 51 watts
12.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD PRO A12-8870E : Q4 2016 ✅
Intel Celeron G3900 : Q1 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD PRO A12-8870E
Intel Celeron G3900
Pro's and Con's
AMD PRO A12-8870E – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD PRO A12-8870E was launched more recently (Q4 2016) compared to the Intel Celeron G3900 (Q1 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD PRO A12-8870E has a higher base clock speed of 2.9 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G3900's 2.8 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD PRO A12-8870E supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G3900's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD PRO A12-8870E has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Celeron G3900's 134.42. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD PRO A12-8870E has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron G3900's 2 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Intel Celeron G3900 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1690, the Intel Celeron G3900 outperforms the AMD PRO A12-8870E (score: 1448). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G3900 features a larger L3 cache of 2MB compared to the AMD PRO A12-8870E's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron G3900 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD PRO A12-8870E's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron G3900 scores 2148, which is lower than the AMD PRO A12-8870E's score of 3023. This makes the AMD PRO A12-8870E a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Celeron G3900 has a higher TDP of 51W compared to the AMD PRO A12-8870E's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
AMD PRO A12-8870E
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Celeron G3900
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD PRO A12-8870E
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Celeron G3900
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD PRO A12-8870E
The AMD PRO A12-8870E is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Celeron G3900
The Intel Celeron G3900 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
