🚀 CPU Launch

Home » Compare » AMD-PRO-A12-9800-vs-AMD-FX-4320

AMD PRO A12-9800 vs AMD FX-4320

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between AMD PRO A12-9800 and AMD FX-4320

Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD. AMD FX-4320 has a higher base speed of 4.0 GHz compared to AMD PRO A12-9800's 3.8 GHz. Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of 4.2 GHz. Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4). Both CPUs support the same number of threads ().

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. AMD PRO A12-9800 uses the AM4 socket, while AMD FX-4320 uses the AM3+ socket. AMD PRO A12-9800 was launched in Q1 2017, while AMD FX-4320 was launched in Q1 2016. AMD FX-4320 has a larger L3 cache of 4 MB compared to AMD PRO A12-9800's MB.

Specification Summary

The AMD PRO A12-9800 and AMD FX-4320 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
  • Speed: The AMD PRO A12-9800 has a base speed of 3.8 GHz, while the AMD FX-4320 runs at 4.0 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The AMD PRO A12-9800 supports a turbo speed of 4.2 GHz, compared to 4.2 GHz for the AMD FX-4320.
  • Cores: The AMD PRO A12-9800 has 4 cores, while the AMD FX-4320 has 4 cores.
  • Threads: The AMD PRO A12-9800 supports threads, compared to threads for the AMD FX-4320.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The AMD PRO A12-9800 uses the AM4, while the AMD FX-4320 uses the AM3+.
  • Launch Date: The AMD PRO A12-9800 was launched on Q1 2017, while the AMD FX-4320 was released on Q1 2016.
  • L3 Cache: The AMD PRO A12-9800 has MB of L3 cache, compared to 4 MB for the AMD FX-4320.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs AMD PRO A12-9800 AMD FX-4320
AMD AMD
Manufacturer AMD AMD
Speed 3.8 GHz 4.0 GHz
Turbo 4.2 GHz 4.2 GHz
Cores 4 4
Threads
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket AM4 AM3+
Launched Q1 2017 Q1 2016
L3 Cache MB 4 MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

AMD PRO A12-9800:



28%
AMD FX-4320:
26%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

AMD PRO A12-9800



5%
AMD FX-4320:
4%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

AMD PRO A12-9800: 65 watts



16.25%
AMD FX-4320: 95 watts
23.75%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


AMD PRO A12-9800 : Q1 2017 ✅

AMD FX-4320 : Q1 2016 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

AMD PRO A12-9800



AMD FX-4320


Pro's and Con's

AMD PRO A12-9800 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The AMD PRO A12-9800 was launched more recently (Q1 2017) compared to the AMD FX-4320 (Q1 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1686, the AMD PRO A12-9800 outperforms the AMD FX-4320 (score: 1564). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.

Cons:

  • Not available

AMD FX-4320 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD FX-4320 has a higher base clock speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the AMD PRO A12-9800's 3.8 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
  • Larger L3 Cache: The AMD FX-4320 features a larger L3 cache of 4MB compared to the AMD PRO A12-9800's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
  • Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD FX-4320 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD PRO A12-9800's 21.92. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD FX-4320 scores 3150, which is lower than the AMD PRO A12-9800's score of 3705. This makes the AMD PRO A12-9800 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
  • Higher Power Consumption: The AMD FX-4320 has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the AMD PRO A12-9800's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.


Productivity


AMD PRO A12-9800
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

AMD FX-4320
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

AMD PRO A12-9800
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

AMD FX-4320
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.



Verdict

AMD PRO A12-9800

The AMD PRO A12-9800 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

AMD FX-4320

The AMD FX-4320 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.