Comparison between AMD PRO A12-9800 and AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD PRO A12-9800 has a higher base speed of 3.8 GHz compared to AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core's 3.2 GHz.
AMD PRO A12-9800 has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core's 4.0 GHz.
AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core has more cores (8) compared to AMD PRO A12-9800's 4 cores.
Both CPUs support the same number of threads ().
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD PRO A12-9800 uses the AM4 socket, while AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core uses the AM3+ socket.
AMD PRO A12-9800 was launched in Q1 2017, while AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core was launched in Q4 2014.
AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core has a larger L3 cache of 8 MB compared to AMD PRO A12-9800's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD PRO A12-9800 and AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD PRO A12-9800 has a base speed of 3.8 GHz, while the AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core runs at 3.2 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD PRO A12-9800 supports a turbo speed of 4.2 GHz, compared to 4.0 GHz for the AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core.
Cores: The AMD PRO A12-9800 has 4 cores, while the AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core has 8 cores.
Threads: The AMD PRO A12-9800 supports threads, compared to threads for the AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD PRO A12-9800 uses the AM4, while the AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core uses the AM3+.
Launch Date: The AMD PRO A12-9800 was launched on Q1 2017, while the AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core was released on Q4 2014.
L3 Cache: The AMD PRO A12-9800 has MB of L3 cache, compared to 8 MB for the AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD PRO A12-9800
AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.8 GHz
3.2 GHz
Turbo
4.2 GHz
4.0 GHz
Cores
4
8
Threads
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
AM3+
Launched
Q1 2017
Q4 2014
L3 Cache
MB
8 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD PRO A12-9800:
28%
AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core:
23%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD PRO A12-9800
5%
AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core:
7%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD PRO A12-9800: 65 watts
16.25%
AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core: 95 watts
23.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD PRO A12-9800 : Q1 2017 ✅
AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core : Q4 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD PRO A12-9800
AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core
Pro's and Con's
AMD PRO A12-9800 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD PRO A12-9800 has a higher base clock speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core's 3.2 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD PRO A12-9800 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core's 4.0 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1686, the AMD PRO A12-9800 outperforms the AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core (score: 1435). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD PRO A12-9800 has 4 cores, which is fewer than the AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core's 8 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD PRO A12-9800 scores 3705, which is lower than the AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core's score of 5107. This makes the AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core was launched more recently (Q4 2014) compared to the AMD PRO A12-9800 (Q1 2017). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core features a larger L3 cache of 8MB compared to the AMD PRO A12-9800's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core has a higher CPU Mark score of 54.91 compared to the AMD PRO A12-9800's 21.92. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the AMD PRO A12-9800's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
AMD PRO A12-9800
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD PRO A12-9800
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD PRO A12-9800
The AMD PRO A12-9800 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core
The AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
