Comparison between AMD PRO A12-9800E and AMD Ryzen 5 1400
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD Ryzen 5 1400 has a higher base speed of 3.2 GHz compared to AMD PRO A12-9800E's 3.1 GHz.
AMD PRO A12-9800E has a higher turbo speed of 3.8 GHz compared to AMD Ryzen 5 1400's 3.4 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4).
AMD Ryzen 5 1400 supports more threads (8) compared to AMD PRO A12-9800E's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Both CPUs use the same socket type: AM4.
AMD PRO A12-9800E was launched in Q1 2017, while AMD Ryzen 5 1400 was launched in Q2 2017.
AMD Ryzen 5 1400 has a larger L3 cache of 8 MB compared to AMD PRO A12-9800E's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD PRO A12-9800E and AMD Ryzen 5 1400 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD PRO A12-9800E has a base speed of 3.1 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 1400 runs at 3.2 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD PRO A12-9800E supports a turbo speed of 3.8 GHz, compared to 3.4 GHz for the AMD Ryzen 5 1400.
Cores: The AMD PRO A12-9800E has 4 cores, while the AMD Ryzen 5 1400 has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD PRO A12-9800E supports threads, compared to 8 threads for the AMD Ryzen 5 1400.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD PRO A12-9800E uses the AM4, while the AMD Ryzen 5 1400 uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The AMD PRO A12-9800E was launched on Q1 2017, while the AMD Ryzen 5 1400 was released on Q2 2017.
L3 Cache: The AMD PRO A12-9800E has MB of L3 cache, compared to 8 MB for the AMD Ryzen 5 1400.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD PRO A12-9800E
AMD Ryzen 5 1400
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Turbo
3.8 GHz
3.4 GHz
Cores
4
4
Threads
8
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
AM4
Launched
Q1 2017
Q2 2017
L3 Cache
MB
8 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD PRO A12-9800E:
25%
AMD Ryzen 5 1400:
31%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD PRO A12-9800E
4%
AMD Ryzen 5 1400:
11%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD PRO A12-9800E: 35 watts
8.75%
AMD Ryzen 5 1400: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD PRO A12-9800E : Q1 2017 ✅
AMD Ryzen 5 1400 : Q2 2017 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD PRO A12-9800E
AMD Ryzen 5 1400
Pro's and Con's
AMD PRO A12-9800E – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD PRO A12-9800E supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 1400's 3.4 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD PRO A12-9800E has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 1400's 8 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD PRO A12-9800E scores 3175, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 1400's score of 7750. This makes the AMD Ryzen 5 1400 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD Ryzen 5 1400 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 5 1400 was launched more recently (Q2 2017) compared to the AMD PRO A12-9800E (Q1 2017). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 1400 has a higher base clock speed of 3.2 GHz compared to the AMD PRO A12-9800E's 3.1 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1893, the AMD Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms the AMD PRO A12-9800E (score: 1508). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 1400 features a larger L3 cache of 8MB compared to the AMD PRO A12-9800E's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 5 1400 has a higher CPU Mark score of 172.22 compared to the AMD PRO A12-9800E's 18.78. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 5 1400 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the AMD PRO A12-9800E's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
AMD PRO A12-9800E
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Ryzen 5 1400
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD PRO A12-9800E
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Ryzen 5 1400
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD PRO A12-9800E
The AMD PRO A12-9800E is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Ryzen 5 1400
The AMD Ryzen 5 1400 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
