Comparison between AMD PRO A12-9800E and Intel Celeron J1750
AMD PRO A12-9800E is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Celeron J1750 is manufactured by Intel.
AMD PRO A12-9800E has a higher base speed of 3.1 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J1750's 2.4 GHz.
AMD PRO A12-9800E has a higher turbo speed of 3.8 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J1750's GHz.
AMD PRO A12-9800E has more cores (4) compared to Intel Celeron J1750's 2 cores.
Intel Celeron J1750 supports more threads (2) compared to AMD PRO A12-9800E's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD PRO A12-9800E uses the AM4 socket, while Intel Celeron J1750 uses the FCBGA1170 socket.
AMD PRO A12-9800E was launched in Q1 2017, while Intel Celeron J1750 was launched in Q2 2014.
Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD PRO A12-9800E and Intel Celeron J1750 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD PRO A12-9800E has a base speed of 3.1 GHz, while the Intel Celeron J1750 runs at 2.4 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD PRO A12-9800E supports a turbo speed of 3.8 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Celeron J1750.
Cores: The AMD PRO A12-9800E has 4 cores, while the Intel Celeron J1750 has 2 cores.
Threads: The AMD PRO A12-9800E supports threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron J1750.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD PRO A12-9800E uses the AM4, while the Intel Celeron J1750 uses the FCBGA1170.
Launch Date: The AMD PRO A12-9800E was launched on Q1 2017, while the Intel Celeron J1750 was released on Q2 2014.
L3 Cache: The AMD PRO A12-9800E has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the Intel Celeron J1750.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD PRO A12-9800E
Intel Celeron J1750
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
3.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Turbo
3.8 GHz
GHz
Cores
4
2
Threads
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
FCBGA1170
Launched
Q1 2017
Q2 2014
L3 Cache
MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD PRO A12-9800E:
25%
Intel Celeron J1750:
10%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD PRO A12-9800E
4%
Intel Celeron J1750:
0%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD PRO A12-9800E: 35 watts
8.75%
Intel Celeron J1750: 10 watts
2.5%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD PRO A12-9800E : Q1 2017 ✅
Intel Celeron J1750 : Q2 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD PRO A12-9800E
Intel Celeron J1750
Pro's and Con's
AMD PRO A12-9800E – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD PRO A12-9800E has a higher base clock speed of 3.1 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J1750's 2.4 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD PRO A12-9800E supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J1750's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1508, the AMD PRO A12-9800E outperforms the Intel Celeron J1750 (score: 642). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD PRO A12-9800E has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron J1750's 2 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD PRO A12-9800E has a higher TDP of 35W compared to the Intel Celeron J1750's 10W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Celeron J1750 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Celeron J1750 was launched more recently (Q2 2014) compared to the AMD PRO A12-9800E (Q1 2017). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron J1750 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD PRO A12-9800E's 18.78. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron J1750 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD PRO A12-9800E's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron J1750 scores 538, which is lower than the AMD PRO A12-9800E's score of 3175. This makes the AMD PRO A12-9800E a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD PRO A12-9800E
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Celeron J1750
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD PRO A12-9800E
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Celeron J1750
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD PRO A12-9800E
The AMD PRO A12-9800E is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Celeron J1750
The Intel Celeron J1750 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
