Comparison between AMD PRO A4-8350B and AMD Athlon X4 880K
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD Athlon X4 880K has a higher base speed of 4.0 GHz compared to AMD PRO A4-8350B's 3.5 GHz.
AMD Athlon X4 880K has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to AMD PRO A4-8350B's 3.9 GHz.
AMD Athlon X4 880K has more cores (4) compared to AMD PRO A4-8350B's 2 cores.
Both CPUs support the same number of threads ().
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Both CPUs use the same socket type: FM2+.
AMD PRO A4-8350B was launched in Q1 2016, while AMD Athlon X4 880K was launched in Q2 2016.
Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD PRO A4-8350B and AMD Athlon X4 880K are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD PRO A4-8350B has a base speed of 3.5 GHz, while the AMD Athlon X4 880K runs at 4.0 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD PRO A4-8350B supports a turbo speed of 3.9 GHz, compared to 4.2 GHz for the AMD Athlon X4 880K.
Cores: The AMD PRO A4-8350B has 2 cores, while the AMD Athlon X4 880K has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD PRO A4-8350B supports threads, compared to threads for the AMD Athlon X4 880K.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD PRO A4-8350B uses the FM2+, while the AMD Athlon X4 880K uses the FM2+.
Launch Date: The AMD PRO A4-8350B was launched on Q1 2016, while the AMD Athlon X4 880K was released on Q2 2016.
L3 Cache: The AMD PRO A4-8350B has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Athlon X4 880K.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD PRO A4-8350B
AMD Athlon X4 880K
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.5 GHz
4.0 GHz
Turbo
3.9 GHz
4.2 GHz
Cores
2
4
Threads
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FM2+
FM2+
Launched
Q1 2016
Q2 2016
L3 Cache
MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD PRO A4-8350B:
23%
AMD Athlon X4 880K:
27%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD PRO A4-8350B
2%
AMD Athlon X4 880K:
5%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD PRO A4-8350B: 65 watts
16.25%
AMD Athlon X4 880K: 95 watts
23.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD PRO A4-8350B : Q1 2016 ✅
AMD Athlon X4 880K : Q2 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD PRO A4-8350B
AMD Athlon X4 880K
Pro's and Con's
AMD PRO A4-8350B – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD PRO A4-8350B has a higher CPU Mark score of 56.89 compared to the AMD Athlon X4 880K's 38.71. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD PRO A4-8350B has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon X4 880K's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD PRO A4-8350B scores 1649, which is lower than the AMD Athlon X4 880K's score of 3663. This makes the AMD Athlon X4 880K a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD Athlon X4 880K – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Athlon X4 880K was launched more recently (Q2 2016) compared to the AMD PRO A4-8350B (Q1 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 880K has a higher base clock speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the AMD PRO A4-8350B's 3.5 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 880K supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the AMD PRO A4-8350B's 3.9 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1633, the AMD Athlon X4 880K outperforms the AMD PRO A4-8350B (score: 1438). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Athlon X4 880K has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the AMD PRO A4-8350B's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
AMD PRO A4-8350B
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Athlon X4 880K
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD PRO A4-8350B
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Athlon X4 880K
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD PRO A4-8350B
The AMD PRO A4-8350B is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Athlon X4 880K
The AMD Athlon X4 880K is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
