Comparison between AMD PRO A6-8570 and Intel Celeron G1620T
AMD PRO A6-8570 is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Celeron G1620T is manufactured by Intel.
AMD PRO A6-8570 has a higher base speed of 3.5 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G1620T's 2.4 GHz.
AMD PRO A6-8570 has a higher turbo speed of 3.8 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G1620T's GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (2).
Intel Celeron G1620T supports more threads (2) compared to AMD PRO A6-8570's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD PRO A6-8570 uses the AM4 socket, while Intel Celeron G1620T uses the LGA1155 socket.
AMD PRO A6-8570 was launched in Q1 2017, while Intel Celeron G1620T was launched in Q1 2014.
Intel Celeron G1620T has a larger L3 cache of 2 MB compared to AMD PRO A6-8570's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD PRO A6-8570 and Intel Celeron G1620T are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD PRO A6-8570 has a base speed of 3.5 GHz, while the Intel Celeron G1620T runs at 2.4 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD PRO A6-8570 supports a turbo speed of 3.8 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Celeron G1620T.
Cores: The AMD PRO A6-8570 has 2 cores, while the Intel Celeron G1620T has 2 cores.
Threads: The AMD PRO A6-8570 supports threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron G1620T.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD PRO A6-8570 uses the AM4, while the Intel Celeron G1620T uses the LGA1155.
Launch Date: The AMD PRO A6-8570 was launched on Q1 2017, while the Intel Celeron G1620T was released on Q1 2014.
L3 Cache: The AMD PRO A6-8570 has MB of L3 cache, compared to 2 MB for the Intel Celeron G1620T.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD PRO A6-8570
Intel Celeron G1620T
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
3.5 GHz
2.4 GHz
Turbo
3.8 GHz
GHz
Cores
2
2
Threads
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
LGA1155
Launched
Q1 2017
Q1 2014
L3 Cache
MB
2 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD PRO A6-8570:
27%
Intel Celeron G1620T:
22%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD PRO A6-8570
2%
Intel Celeron G1620T:
2%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD PRO A6-8570: 65 watts
16.25%
Intel Celeron G1620T: 35 watts
8.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD PRO A6-8570 : Q1 2017 ✅
Intel Celeron G1620T : Q1 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD PRO A6-8570
Intel Celeron G1620T
Pro's and Con's
AMD PRO A6-8570 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD PRO A6-8570 was launched more recently (Q1 2017) compared to the Intel Celeron G1620T (Q1 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD PRO A6-8570 has a higher base clock speed of 3.5 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G1620T's 2.4 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD PRO A6-8570 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G1620T's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1646, the AMD PRO A6-8570 outperforms the Intel Celeron G1620T (score: 1327). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD PRO A6-8570 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Celeron G1620T's 36.48. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD PRO A6-8570 has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron G1620T's 2 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD PRO A6-8570 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron G1620T's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Celeron G1620T – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G1620T features a larger L3 cache of 2MB compared to the AMD PRO A6-8570's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron G1620T scores 1532, which is lower than the AMD PRO A6-8570's score of 1906. This makes the AMD PRO A6-8570 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD PRO A6-8570
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Celeron G1620T
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD PRO A6-8570
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Celeron G1620T
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD PRO A6-8570
The AMD PRO A6-8570 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Celeron G1620T
The Intel Celeron G1620T is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
