Comparison between AMD Phenom II X6 1405T and Intel Celeron G3900
AMD Phenom II X6 1405T is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Celeron G3900 is manufactured by Intel.
AMD Phenom II X6 1405T has a higher base speed of 3.0 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G3900's 2.8 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of GHz.
AMD Phenom II X6 1405T has more cores (6) compared to Intel Celeron G3900's 2 cores.
AMD Phenom II X6 1405T supports more threads (6) compared to Intel Celeron G3900's 2 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Phenom II X6 1405T uses the AM2+,AM3 socket, while Intel Celeron G3900 uses the FCLGA1151 socket.
AMD Phenom II X6 1405T was launched in Q1 2018, while Intel Celeron G3900 was launched in Q1 2016.
AMD Phenom II X6 1405T has a larger L3 cache of 6 MB compared to Intel Celeron G3900's 2 MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Phenom II X6 1405T and Intel Celeron G3900 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Phenom II X6 1405T has a base speed of 3.0 GHz, while the Intel Celeron G3900 runs at 2.8 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Phenom II X6 1405T supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Celeron G3900.
Cores: The AMD Phenom II X6 1405T has 6 cores, while the Intel Celeron G3900 has 2 cores.
Threads: The AMD Phenom II X6 1405T supports 6 threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron G3900.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Phenom II X6 1405T uses the AM2+,AM3, while the Intel Celeron G3900 uses the FCLGA1151.
Launch Date: The AMD Phenom II X6 1405T was launched on Q1 2018, while the Intel Celeron G3900 was released on Q1 2016.
L3 Cache: The AMD Phenom II X6 1405T has 6 MB of L3 cache, compared to 2 MB for the Intel Celeron G3900.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Phenom II X6 1405T
Intel Celeron G3900
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
3.0 GHz
2.8 GHz
Turbo
GHz
GHz
Cores
6
2
Threads
6
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM2+,AM3
FCLGA1151
Launched
Q1 2018
Q1 2016
L3 Cache
6 MB
2 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Phenom II X6 1405T:
20%
Intel Celeron G3900:
28%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Phenom II X6 1405T
4%
Intel Celeron G3900:
3%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Phenom II X6 1405T: 95 watts
23.75%
Intel Celeron G3900: 51 watts
12.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Phenom II X6 1405T : Q1 2018 ✅
Intel Celeron G3900 : Q1 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Phenom II X6 1405T
Intel Celeron G3900
Pro's and Con's
AMD Phenom II X6 1405T – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Phenom II X6 1405T was launched more recently (Q1 2018) compared to the Intel Celeron G3900 (Q1 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Phenom II X6 1405T has a higher base clock speed of 3.0 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G3900's 2.8 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Phenom II X6 1405T features a larger L3 cache of 6MB compared to the Intel Celeron G3900's 2MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Phenom II X6 1405T has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Celeron G3900's 134.42. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Phenom II X6 1405T has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the Intel Celeron G3900's 51W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Celeron G3900 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1690, the Intel Celeron G3900 outperforms the AMD Phenom II X6 1405T (score: 1247). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron G3900 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Phenom II X6 1405T's 6 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron G3900 has 2 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Phenom II X6 1405T's 6 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron G3900 scores 2148, which is lower than the AMD Phenom II X6 1405T's score of 3335. This makes the AMD Phenom II X6 1405T a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Phenom II X6 1405T
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Celeron G3900
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Phenom II X6 1405T
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Celeron G3900
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Phenom II X6 1405T
The AMD Phenom II X6 1405T is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Celeron G3900
The Intel Celeron G3900 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
