Comparison between AMD Ryzen 3 3200G and Intel Core i5-4400E
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Core i5-4400E is manufactured by Intel.
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G has a higher base speed of 3.6 GHz compared to Intel Core i5-4400E's 2.7 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G has a higher turbo speed of 4.0 GHz compared to Intel Core i5-4400E's 3.3 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G has more cores (4) compared to Intel Core i5-4400E's 2 cores.
Both CPUs support the same number of threads (4).
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G uses the AM4 socket, while Intel Core i5-4400E uses the BGA1364 socket.
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G was launched in Q3 2019, while Intel Core i5-4400E was launched in Q1 2014.
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G has a larger L3 cache of 4 MB compared to Intel Core i5-4400E's 3 MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 3 3200G and Intel Core i5-4400E are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200G has a base speed of 3.6 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-4400E runs at 2.7 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200G supports a turbo speed of 4.0 GHz, compared to 3.3 GHz for the Intel Core i5-4400E.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200G has 4 cores, while the Intel Core i5-4400E has 2 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200G supports 4 threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Core i5-4400E.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200G uses the AM4, while the Intel Core i5-4400E uses the BGA1364.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200G was launched on Q3 2019, while the Intel Core i5-4400E was released on Q1 2014.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200G has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to 3 MB for the Intel Core i5-4400E.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
Intel Core i5-4400E
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
3.6 GHz
2.7 GHz
Turbo
4.0 GHz
3.3 GHz
Cores
4
2
Threads
4
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
BGA1364
Launched
Q3 2019
Q1 2014
L3 Cache
4 MB
3 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G:
36%
Intel Core i5-4400E:
30%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
10%
Intel Core i5-4400E:
4%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G: 65 watts
16.25%
Intel Core i5-4400E: 37 watts
9.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G : Q3 2019 ✅
Intel Core i5-4400E : Q1 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
Intel Core i5-4400E
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200G was launched more recently (Q3 2019) compared to the Intel Core i5-4400E (Q1 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200G has a higher base clock speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the Intel Core i5-4400E's 2.7 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200G supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the Intel Core i5-4400E's 3.3 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2205, the AMD Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms the Intel Core i5-4400E (score: 1804). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200G features a larger L3 cache of 4MB compared to the Intel Core i5-4400E's 3MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200G has a higher CPU Mark score of 100.91 compared to the Intel Core i5-4400E's 12.22. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200G has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Core i5-4400E's 37W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Core i5-4400E – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Not available
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Core i5-4400E has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 3 3200G's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Core i5-4400E scores 3251, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 3 3200G's score of 7124. This makes the AMD Ryzen 3 3200G a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Core i5-4400E
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Core i5-4400E
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
The AMD Ryzen 3 3200G is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Core i5-4400E
The Intel Core i5-4400E is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
