Comparison between AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE and Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200
AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 is manufactured by Intel.
AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE has a higher base speed of 3.3 GHz compared to Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's 2.4 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE has a higher turbo speed of 3.8 GHz compared to Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4).
Both CPUs support the same number of threads (4).
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE uses the AM4 socket, while Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 uses the socket.
AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE was launched in Q3 2020, while Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 was launched in Q4 2019.
AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE has a larger L3 cache of 4 MB compared to Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE and Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE has a base speed of 3.3 GHz, while the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 runs at 2.4 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE supports a turbo speed of 3.8 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE has 4 cores, while the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE supports 4 threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE uses the AM4, while the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 uses the .
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE was launched on Q3 2020, while the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 was released on Q4 2019.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
3.3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Turbo
3.8 GHz
GHz
Cores
4
4
Threads
4
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
Launched
Q3 2020
Q4 2019
L3 Cache
4 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE:
36%
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200:
18%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE
10%
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200:
2%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE: 35 watts
8.75%
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200: watts
0%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE : Q3 2020 ✅
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 : Q4 2019 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE has a higher base clock speed of 3.3 GHz compared to the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's 2.4 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2206, the AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE outperforms the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 (score: 1080). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE features a larger L3 cache of 4MB compared to the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE has a higher TDP of 35W compared to the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 was launched more recently (Q4 2019) compared to the AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE (Q3 2020). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Cons:
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 scores 2011, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE's score of 7309. This makes the AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE
The AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200
The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
