Comparison between AMD Ryzen 3 3300X and Intel Celeron J3160
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Celeron J3160 is manufactured by Intel.
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X has a higher base speed of 3.8 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J3160's 1.6 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X has a higher turbo speed of 4.3 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J3160's 2.2 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4).
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X supports more threads (8) compared to Intel Celeron J3160's 4 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X uses the AM4 socket, while Intel Celeron J3160 uses the BGA1170 socket.
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X was launched in Q2 2020, while Intel Celeron J3160 was launched in Q2 2016.
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X has a larger L3 cache of 16 MB compared to Intel Celeron J3160's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X and Intel Celeron J3160 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X has a base speed of 3.8 GHz, while the Intel Celeron J3160 runs at 1.6 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X supports a turbo speed of 4.3 GHz, compared to 2.2 GHz for the Intel Celeron J3160.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X has 4 cores, while the Intel Celeron J3160 has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X supports 8 threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Celeron J3160.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X uses the AM4, while the Intel Celeron J3160 uses the BGA1170.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X was launched on Q2 2020, while the Intel Celeron J3160 was released on Q2 2016.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X has 16 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the Intel Celeron J3160.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
Intel Celeron J3160
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
3.8 GHz
1.6 GHz
Turbo
4.3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Cores
4
4
Threads
8
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
BGA1170
Launched
Q2 2020
Q2 2016
L3 Cache
16 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X:
44%
Intel Celeron J3160:
10%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
18%
Intel Celeron J3160:
1%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X: 65 watts
16.25%
Intel Celeron J3160: 6 watts
1.5%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X : Q2 2020 ✅
Intel Celeron J3160 : Q2 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
Intel Celeron J3160
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X was launched more recently (Q2 2020) compared to the Intel Celeron J3160 (Q2 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X has a higher base clock speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J3160's 1.6 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.3 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J3160's 2.2 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2673, the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the Intel Celeron J3160 (score: 605). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X features a larger L3 cache of 16MB compared to the Intel Celeron J3160's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron J3160's 6W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Celeron J3160 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron J3160 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X's 120.38. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron J3160 has 4 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X's 8 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron J3160 scores 1271, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X's score of 12627. This makes the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Celeron J3160
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Intel Celeron J3160
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Celeron J3160
The Intel Celeron J3160 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
