Comparison between AMD Ryzen 3 4300G and Intel Core i3-7320
AMD Ryzen 3 4300G is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Core i3-7320 is manufactured by Intel.
Intel Core i3-7320 has a higher base speed of 4.1 GHz compared to AMD Ryzen 3 4300G's 3.8 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 3 4300G has a higher turbo speed of 4.0 GHz compared to Intel Core i3-7320's GHz.
AMD Ryzen 3 4300G has more cores (4) compared to Intel Core i3-7320's 2 cores.
AMD Ryzen 3 4300G supports more threads (8) compared to Intel Core i3-7320's 4 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen 3 4300G uses the AM4 socket, while Intel Core i3-7320 uses the FCLGA1151 socket.
AMD Ryzen 3 4300G was launched in Q3 2020, while Intel Core i3-7320 was launched in Q1 2017.
Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of 4 MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 3 4300G and Intel Core i3-7320 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 4300G has a base speed of 3.8 GHz, while the Intel Core i3-7320 runs at 4.1 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 3 4300G supports a turbo speed of 4.0 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Core i3-7320.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 3 4300G has 4 cores, while the Intel Core i3-7320 has 2 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 3 4300G supports 8 threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Core i3-7320.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 3 4300G uses the AM4, while the Intel Core i3-7320 uses the FCLGA1151.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 3 4300G was launched on Q3 2020, while the Intel Core i3-7320 was released on Q1 2017.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 3 4300G has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to 4 MB for the Intel Core i3-7320.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 3 4300G
Intel Core i3-7320
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
3.8 GHz
4.1 GHz
Turbo
4.0 GHz
GHz
Cores
4
2
Threads
8
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
FCLGA1151
Launched
Q3 2020
Q1 2017
L3 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 3 4300G:
42%
Intel Core i3-7320:
41%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 3 4300G
15%
Intel Core i3-7320:
7%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 3 4300G: 65 watts
16.25%
Intel Core i3-7320: 51 watts
12.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 3 4300G : Q3 2020 ✅
Intel Core i3-7320 : Q1 2017 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 3 4300G
Intel Core i3-7320
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 3 4300G – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 3 4300G was launched more recently (Q3 2020) compared to the Intel Core i3-7320 (Q1 2017). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 4300G supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the Intel Core i3-7320's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2524, the AMD Ryzen 3 4300G outperforms the Intel Core i3-7320 (score: 2508). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 3 4300G has a higher CPU Mark score of 75.89 compared to the Intel Core i3-7320's 45.24. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 3 4300G has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Core i3-7320's 51W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Core i3-7320 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Core i3-7320 has a higher base clock speed of 4.1 GHz compared to the AMD Ryzen 3 4300G's 3.8 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Core i3-7320 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 3 4300G's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Core i3-7320 has 4 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 3 4300G's 8 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Core i3-7320 scores 4840, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 3 4300G's score of 10798. This makes the AMD Ryzen 3 4300G a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 3 4300G
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Core i3-7320
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 3 4300G
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Core i3-7320
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 3 4300G
The AMD Ryzen 3 4300G is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Core i3-7320
The Intel Core i3-7320 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
