Comparison between AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and AMD Sempron 3850 APU
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 has a higher base speed of 3.5 GHz compared to AMD Sempron 3850 APU's 1.3 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 has a higher turbo speed of 3.7 GHz compared to AMD Sempron 3850 APU's GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4).
Both CPUs support the same number of threads (4).
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 uses the AM4 socket, while AMD Sempron 3850 APU uses the AM1,FS1b socket.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 was launched in Q3 2017, while AMD Sempron 3850 APU was launched in Q2 2014.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 has a larger L3 cache of 8 MB compared to AMD Sempron 3850 APU's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and AMD Sempron 3850 APU are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 has a base speed of 3.5 GHz, while the AMD Sempron 3850 APU runs at 1.3 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 supports a turbo speed of 3.7 GHz, compared to GHz for the AMD Sempron 3850 APU.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 has 4 cores, while the AMD Sempron 3850 APU has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 supports 4 threads, compared to 4 threads for the AMD Sempron 3850 APU.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 uses the AM4, while the AMD Sempron 3850 APU uses the AM1,FS1b.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 was launched on Q3 2017, while the AMD Sempron 3850 APU was released on Q2 2014.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 has 8 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Sempron 3850 APU.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
AMD Sempron 3850 APU
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.5 GHz
1.3 GHz
Turbo
3.7 GHz
GHz
Cores
4
4
Threads
4
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
AM1,FS1b
Launched
Q3 2017
Q2 2014
L3 Cache
8 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300:
36%
AMD Sempron 3850 APU:
7%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
10%
AMD Sempron 3850 APU:
1%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300: 65 watts
16.25%
AMD Sempron 3850 APU: 25 watts
6.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 : Q3 2017 ✅
AMD Sempron 3850 APU : Q2 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
AMD Sempron 3850 APU
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 was launched more recently (Q3 2017) compared to the AMD Sempron 3850 APU (Q2 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 has a higher base clock speed of 3.5 GHz compared to the AMD Sempron 3850 APU's 1.3 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.7 GHz compared to the AMD Sempron 3850 APU's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2187, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 outperforms the AMD Sempron 3850 APU (score: 448). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 features a larger L3 cache of 8MB compared to the AMD Sempron 3850 APU's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Sempron 3850 APU's 24.31. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the AMD Sempron 3850 APU's 25W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
AMD Sempron 3850 APU – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Not available
Cons:
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Sempron 3850 APU scores 1156, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300's score of 7234. This makes the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Sempron 3850 APU
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Sempron 3850 APU
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Sempron 3850 APU
The AMD Sempron 3850 APU is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
