Comparison between AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and AMD A10-6700T APU
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has a higher base speed of 3.6 GHz compared to AMD A10-6700T APU's 2.5 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has a higher turbo speed of 4.0 GHz compared to AMD A10-6700T APU's 3.5 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4).
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G supports more threads (4) compared to AMD A10-6700T APU's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G uses the AM4 socket, while AMD A10-6700T APU uses the FM2 socket.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G was launched in Q4 2019, while AMD A10-6700T APU was launched in Q2 2014.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has a larger L3 cache of 4 MB compared to AMD A10-6700T APU's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and AMD A10-6700T APU are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has a base speed of 3.6 GHz, while the AMD A10-6700T APU runs at 2.5 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G supports a turbo speed of 4.0 GHz, compared to 3.5 GHz for the AMD A10-6700T APU.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has 4 cores, while the AMD A10-6700T APU has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G supports 4 threads, compared to threads for the AMD A10-6700T APU.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G uses the AM4, while the AMD A10-6700T APU uses the FM2.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G was launched on Q4 2019, while the AMD A10-6700T APU was released on Q2 2014.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD A10-6700T APU.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
AMD A10-6700T APU
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Turbo
4.0 GHz
3.5 GHz
Cores
4
4
Threads
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
FM2
Launched
Q4 2019
Q2 2014
L3 Cache
4 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G:
36%
AMD A10-6700T APU:
21%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
10%
AMD A10-6700T APU:
3%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G: 65 watts
16.25%
AMD A10-6700T APU: 45 watts
11.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G : Q4 2019 ✅
AMD A10-6700T APU : Q2 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
AMD A10-6700T APU
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G was launched more recently (Q4 2019) compared to the AMD A10-6700T APU (Q2 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has a higher base clock speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the AMD A10-6700T APU's 2.5 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the AMD A10-6700T APU's 3.5 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2191, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G outperforms the AMD A10-6700T APU (score: 1290). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G features a larger L3 cache of 4MB compared to the AMD A10-6700T APU's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD A10-6700T APU's 26.12. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the AMD A10-6700T APU's 45W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
AMD A10-6700T APU – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Not available
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD A10-6700T APU has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD A10-6700T APU scores 2299, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G's score of 6989. This makes the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD A10-6700T APU
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD A10-6700T APU
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD A10-6700T APU
The AMD A10-6700T APU is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
