Comparison between AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and AMD Sempron 240
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has a higher base speed of 3.6 GHz compared to AMD Sempron 240's 2.9 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has a higher turbo speed of 4.0 GHz compared to AMD Sempron 240's 3.3 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has more cores (4) compared to AMD Sempron 240's 2 cores.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G supports more threads (4) compared to AMD Sempron 240's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G uses the AM4 socket, while AMD Sempron 240 uses the FM2 socket.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G was launched in Q4 2019, while AMD Sempron 240 was launched in Q4 2018.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has a larger L3 cache of 4 MB compared to AMD Sempron 240's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and AMD Sempron 240 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has a base speed of 3.6 GHz, while the AMD Sempron 240 runs at 2.9 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G supports a turbo speed of 4.0 GHz, compared to 3.3 GHz for the AMD Sempron 240.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has 4 cores, while the AMD Sempron 240 has 2 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G supports 4 threads, compared to threads for the AMD Sempron 240.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G uses the AM4, while the AMD Sempron 240 uses the FM2.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G was launched on Q4 2019, while the AMD Sempron 240 was released on Q4 2018.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Sempron 240.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
AMD Sempron 240
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Turbo
4.0 GHz
3.3 GHz
Cores
4
2
Threads
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
FM2
Launched
Q4 2019
Q4 2018
L3 Cache
4 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G:
36%
AMD Sempron 240:
21%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
10%
AMD Sempron 240:
1%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G: 65 watts
16.25%
AMD Sempron 240: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G : Q4 2019 ✅
AMD Sempron 240 : Q4 2018 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
AMD Sempron 240
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G was launched more recently (Q4 2019) compared to the AMD Sempron 240 (Q4 2018). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has a higher base clock speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the AMD Sempron 240's 2.9 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the AMD Sempron 240's 3.3 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2191, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G outperforms the AMD Sempron 240 (score: 1300). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G features a larger L3 cache of 4MB compared to the AMD Sempron 240's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Sempron 240's 35.39. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Not available
AMD Sempron 240 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Not available
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Sempron 240 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The AMD Sempron 240 has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Sempron 240 scores 1278, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G's score of 6989. This makes the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Sempron 240
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Sempron 240
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Sempron 240
The AMD Sempron 240 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
