Comparison between AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G and AMD Athlon X4 950
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G has a higher base speed of 3.6 GHz compared to AMD Athlon X4 950's 3.5 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G has a higher turbo speed of 4.9 GHz compared to AMD Athlon X4 950's 3.8 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4).
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G supports more threads (8) compared to AMD Athlon X4 950's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G uses the AM5 socket, while AMD Athlon X4 950 uses the AM4 socket.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G was launched in Q2 2024, while AMD Athlon X4 950 was launched in Q3 2017.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G has a larger L3 cache of 8 MB compared to AMD Athlon X4 950's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G and AMD Athlon X4 950 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G has a base speed of 3.6 GHz, while the AMD Athlon X4 950 runs at 3.5 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G supports a turbo speed of 4.9 GHz, compared to 3.8 GHz for the AMD Athlon X4 950.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G has 4 cores, while the AMD Athlon X4 950 has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G supports 8 threads, compared to threads for the AMD Athlon X4 950.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G uses the AM5, while the AMD Athlon X4 950 uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G was launched on Q2 2024, while the AMD Athlon X4 950 was released on Q3 2017.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G has 8 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Athlon X4 950.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G
AMD Athlon X4 950
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Turbo
4.9 GHz
3.8 GHz
Cores
4
4
Threads
8
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM5
AM4
Launched
Q2 2024
Q3 2017
L3 Cache
8 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G:
64%
AMD Athlon X4 950:
27%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G
21%
AMD Athlon X4 950:
5%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G: 65 watts
16.25%
AMD Athlon X4 950: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G : Q2 2024 ✅
AMD Athlon X4 950 : Q3 2017 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G
AMD Athlon X4 950
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G has a higher base clock speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon X4 950's 3.5 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.9 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon X4 950's 3.8 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 3840, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G outperforms the AMD Athlon X4 950 (score: 1636). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G features a larger L3 cache of 8MB compared to the AMD Athlon X4 950's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Athlon X4 950's 122.72. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Not available
AMD Athlon X4 950 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Athlon X4 950 was launched more recently (Q3 2017) compared to the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G (Q2 2024). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD Athlon X4 950 has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G's 8 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon X4 950 scores 3591, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G's score of 14572. This makes the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Athlon X4 950
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Athlon X4 950
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G
The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Athlon X4 950
The AMD Athlon X4 950 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
