Comparison between AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G and Intel Core i5-11600
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Core i5-11600 is manufactured by Intel.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G has a higher base speed of 3.6 GHz compared to Intel Core i5-11600's 2.8 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G has a higher turbo speed of 4.9 GHz compared to Intel Core i5-11600's 4.8 GHz.
Intel Core i5-11600 has more cores (6) compared to AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G's 4 cores.
Intel Core i5-11600 supports more threads (12) compared to AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G's 8 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G uses the AM5 socket, while Intel Core i5-11600 uses the FCLGA1200 socket.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G was launched in Q2 2024, while Intel Core i5-11600 was launched in Q2 2021.
Intel Core i5-11600 has a larger L3 cache of 12 MB compared to AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G's 8 MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G and Intel Core i5-11600 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G has a base speed of 3.6 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-11600 runs at 2.8 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G supports a turbo speed of 4.9 GHz, compared to 4.8 GHz for the Intel Core i5-11600.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G has 4 cores, while the Intel Core i5-11600 has 6 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G supports 8 threads, compared to 12 threads for the Intel Core i5-11600.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G uses the AM5, while the Intel Core i5-11600 uses the FCLGA1200.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G was launched on Q2 2024, while the Intel Core i5-11600 was released on Q2 2021.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G has 8 MB of L3 cache, compared to 12 MB for the Intel Core i5-11600.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G
Intel Core i5-11600
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
3.6 GHz
2.8 GHz
Turbo
4.9 GHz
4.8 GHz
Cores
4
6
Threads
8
12
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM5
FCLGA1200
Launched
Q2 2024
Q2 2021
L3 Cache
8 MB
12 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G:
64%
Intel Core i5-11600:
54%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G
21%
Intel Core i5-11600:
26%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G: 65 watts
16.25%
Intel Core i5-11600: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G : Q2 2024 ✅
Intel Core i5-11600 : Q2 2021 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G
Intel Core i5-11600
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G was launched more recently (Q2 2024) compared to the Intel Core i5-11600 (Q2 2021). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G has a higher base clock speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the Intel Core i5-11600's 2.8 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.9 GHz compared to the Intel Core i5-11600's 4.8 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 3840, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G outperforms the Intel Core i5-11600 (score: 3293). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Core i5-11600's 97.66. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G has 4 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core i5-11600's 6 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G has 8 threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i5-11600's 12 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G scores 14572, which is lower than the Intel Core i5-11600's score of 18054. This makes the Intel Core i5-11600 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Intel Core i5-11600 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i5-11600 features a larger L3 cache of 12MB compared to the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G's 8MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Not available
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Core i5-11600
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Core i5-11600
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G
The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Core i5-11600
The Intel Core i5-11600 is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
