🚀 CPU Launch

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G vs AMD Athlon II X4 655

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between AMD Ryzen 5 2400G and AMD Athlon II X4 655

Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD. AMD Ryzen 5 2400G has a higher base speed of 3.6 GHz compared to AMD Athlon II X4 655's 3.3 GHz. AMD Ryzen 5 2400G has a higher turbo speed of 3.9 GHz compared to AMD Athlon II X4 655's GHz. Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4). AMD Ryzen 5 2400G supports more threads (8) compared to AMD Athlon II X4 655's 4 threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. AMD Ryzen 5 2400G uses the AM4 socket, while AMD Athlon II X4 655 uses the AM2+ socket. AMD Ryzen 5 2400G was launched in Q1 2018, while AMD Athlon II X4 655 was launched in Q1 2014. AMD Ryzen 5 2400G has a larger L3 cache of 4 MB compared to AMD Athlon II X4 655's MB.

Specification Summary

The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G and AMD Athlon II X4 655 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
  • Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G has a base speed of 3.6 GHz, while the AMD Athlon II X4 655 runs at 3.3 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G supports a turbo speed of 3.9 GHz, compared to GHz for the AMD Athlon II X4 655.
  • Cores: The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G has 4 cores, while the AMD Athlon II X4 655 has 4 cores.
  • Threads: The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G supports 8 threads, compared to 4 threads for the AMD Athlon II X4 655.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G uses the AM4, while the AMD Athlon II X4 655 uses the AM2+.
  • Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G was launched on Q1 2018, while the AMD Athlon II X4 655 was released on Q1 2014.
  • L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Athlon II X4 655.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs AMD Ryzen 5 2400G AMD Athlon II X4 655
AMD AMD
Manufacturer AMD AMD
Speed 3.6 GHz 3.3 GHz
Turbo 3.9 GHz GHz
Cores 4 4
Threads 8 4
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket AM4 AM2+
Launched Q1 2018 Q1 2014
L3 Cache 4 MB MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G:



35%
AMD Athlon II X4 655:
24%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G



12%
AMD Athlon II X4 655:
3%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G: 65 watts



16.25%
AMD Athlon II X4 655: 95 watts
23.75%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


AMD Ryzen 5 2400G : Q1 2018 ✅

AMD Athlon II X4 655 : Q1 2014 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G



AMD Athlon II X4 655


Pro's and Con's

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G was launched more recently (Q1 2018) compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 655 (Q1 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G has a higher base clock speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 655's 3.3 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
  • Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.9 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 655's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2147, the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms the AMD Athlon II X4 655 (score: 1473). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
  • Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G features a larger L3 cache of 4MB compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 655's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.

Cons:

  • Not available

AMD Athlon II X4 655 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Athlon II X4 655 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G's 156.67. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

  • Fewer Threads: The AMD Athlon II X4 655 has 4 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G's 8 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon II X4 655 scores 2078, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G's score of 8731. This makes the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
  • Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Athlon II X4 655 has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.


Productivity


AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

AMD Athlon II X4 655
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

AMD Athlon II X4 655
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.



Verdict

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G

The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

AMD Athlon II X4 655

The AMD Athlon II X4 655 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.