Comparison between AMD Ryzen 5 2400G and Intel Celeron G4900T
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Celeron G4900T is manufactured by Intel.
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G has a higher base speed of 3.6 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G4900T's 2.9 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G has a higher turbo speed of 3.9 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G4900T's GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G has more cores (4) compared to Intel Celeron G4900T's 2 cores.
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G supports more threads (8) compared to Intel Celeron G4900T's 2 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G uses the AM4 socket, while Intel Celeron G4900T uses the FCLGA1151-2 socket.
Both CPUs were launched in the same year: Q1 2018.
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G has a larger L3 cache of 4 MB compared to Intel Celeron G4900T's 2 MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G and Intel Celeron G4900T are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G has a base speed of 3.6 GHz, while the Intel Celeron G4900T runs at 2.9 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G supports a turbo speed of 3.9 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Celeron G4900T.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G has 4 cores, while the Intel Celeron G4900T has 2 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G supports 8 threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron G4900T.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G uses the AM4, while the Intel Celeron G4900T uses the FCLGA1151-2.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G was launched on Q1 2018, while the Intel Celeron G4900T was released on Q1 2018.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to 2 MB for the Intel Celeron G4900T.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Intel Celeron G4900T
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
3.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Turbo
3.9 GHz
GHz
Cores
4
2
Threads
8
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
FCLGA1151-2
Launched
Q1 2018
Q1 2018
L3 Cache
4 MB
2 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G:
35%
Intel Celeron G4900T:
28%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
12%
Intel Celeron G4900T:
3%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G: 65 watts
16.25%
Intel Celeron G4900T: 35 watts
8.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G : Q1 2018 ✅
Intel Celeron G4900T : Q1 2018 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Intel Celeron G4900T
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G has a higher base clock speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G4900T's 2.9 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.9 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G4900T's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2147, the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms the Intel Celeron G4900T (score: 1737). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G features a larger L3 cache of 4MB compared to the Intel Celeron G4900T's 2MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G has a higher CPU Mark score of 156.67 compared to the Intel Celeron G4900T's 37.35. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron G4900T's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Celeron G4900T – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Not available
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron G4900T has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron G4900T has 2 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G's 8 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron G4900T scores 2239, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G's score of 8731. This makes the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Celeron G4900T
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Celeron G4900T
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Celeron G4900T
The Intel Celeron G4900T is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
