Comparison between AMD Ryzen 5 2400G and Intel Core i3-6300
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Core i3-6300 is manufactured by Intel.
Intel Core i3-6300 has a higher base speed of 3.8 GHz compared to AMD Ryzen 5 2400G's 3.6 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G has a higher turbo speed of 3.9 GHz compared to Intel Core i3-6300's GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G has more cores (4) compared to Intel Core i3-6300's 2 cores.
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G supports more threads (8) compared to Intel Core i3-6300's 4 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G uses the AM4 socket, while Intel Core i3-6300 uses the LGA socket.
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G was launched in Q1 2018, while Intel Core i3-6300 was launched in Q4 2015.
Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of 4 MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G and Intel Core i3-6300 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G has a base speed of 3.6 GHz, while the Intel Core i3-6300 runs at 3.8 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G supports a turbo speed of 3.9 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Core i3-6300.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G has 4 cores, while the Intel Core i3-6300 has 2 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G supports 8 threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Core i3-6300.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G uses the AM4, while the Intel Core i3-6300 uses the LGA.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G was launched on Q1 2018, while the Intel Core i3-6300 was released on Q4 2015.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to 4 MB for the Intel Core i3-6300.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Intel Core i3-6300
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
3.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Turbo
3.9 GHz
GHz
Cores
4
2
Threads
8
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
LGA
Launched
Q1 2018
Q4 2015
L3 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G:
35%
Intel Core i3-6300:
37%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
12%
Intel Core i3-6300:
6%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G: 65 watts
16.25%
Intel Core i3-6300: 51 watts
12.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G : Q1 2018 ✅
Intel Core i3-6300 : Q4 2015 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Intel Core i3-6300
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.9 GHz compared to the Intel Core i3-6300's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G has a higher CPU Mark score of 156.67 compared to the Intel Core i3-6300's 39.79. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Core i3-6300's 51W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Core i3-6300 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Core i3-6300 was launched more recently (Q4 2015) compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G (Q1 2018). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Core i3-6300 has a higher base clock speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G's 3.6 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2278, the Intel Core i3-6300 outperforms the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G (score: 2147). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Core i3-6300 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Core i3-6300 has 4 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G's 8 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Core i3-6300 scores 4325, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G's score of 8731. This makes the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Core i3-6300
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Core i3-6300
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Core i3-6300
The Intel Core i3-6300 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
