🚀 CPU Launch

Home » Compare » AMD-Ryzen-5-2500X-vs-AMD-FX-6330-Six-Core

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X vs AMD FX-6330 Six-Core

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between AMD Ryzen 5 2500X and AMD FX-6330 Six-Core

Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD. Both CPUs have the same base speed of 3.6 GHz. AMD FX-6330 Six-Core has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to AMD Ryzen 5 2500X's 4.0 GHz. AMD FX-6330 Six-Core has more cores (6) compared to AMD Ryzen 5 2500X's 4 cores. AMD Ryzen 5 2500X supports more threads (8) compared to AMD FX-6330 Six-Core's threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. AMD Ryzen 5 2500X uses the AM4 socket, while AMD FX-6330 Six-Core uses the AM3+ socket. AMD Ryzen 5 2500X was launched in Q1 2019, while AMD FX-6330 Six-Core was launched in Q4 2016. Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of 8 MB.

Specification Summary

The AMD Ryzen 5 2500X and AMD FX-6330 Six-Core are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
  • Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 2500X has a base speed of 3.6 GHz, while the AMD FX-6330 Six-Core runs at 3.6 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 5 2500X supports a turbo speed of 4.0 GHz, compared to 4.2 GHz for the AMD FX-6330 Six-Core.
  • Cores: The AMD Ryzen 5 2500X has 4 cores, while the AMD FX-6330 Six-Core has 6 cores.
  • Threads: The AMD Ryzen 5 2500X supports 8 threads, compared to threads for the AMD FX-6330 Six-Core.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The AMD Ryzen 5 2500X uses the AM4, while the AMD FX-6330 Six-Core uses the AM3+.
  • Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 5 2500X was launched on Q1 2019, while the AMD FX-6330 Six-Core was released on Q4 2016.
  • L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 2500X has 8 MB of L3 cache, compared to 8 MB for the AMD FX-6330 Six-Core.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs AMD Ryzen 5 2500X AMD FX-6330 Six-Core
AMD AMD
Manufacturer AMD AMD
Speed 3.6 GHz 3.6 GHz
Turbo 4.0 GHz 4.2 GHz
Cores 4 6
Threads 8
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket AM4 AM3+
Launched Q1 2019 Q4 2016
L3 Cache 8 MB 8 MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X:



38%
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core:
25%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X



13%
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core:
6%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X: 65 watts



16.25%
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core: 95 watts
23.75%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


AMD Ryzen 5 2500X : Q1 2019 ✅

AMD FX-6330 Six-Core : Q4 2016 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X



AMD FX-6330 Six-Core


Pro's and Con's

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2327, the AMD Ryzen 5 2500X outperforms the AMD FX-6330 Six-Core (score: 1531). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.

Cons:

  • Fewer Cores: The AMD Ryzen 5 2500X has 4 cores, which is fewer than the AMD FX-6330 Six-Core's 6 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.

AMD FX-6330 Six-Core – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The AMD FX-6330 Six-Core was launched more recently (Q4 2016) compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 2500X (Q1 2019). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
  • Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD FX-6330 Six-Core supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 2500X's 4.0 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.

Cons:

  • Fewer Threads: The AMD FX-6330 Six-Core has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 2500X's 8 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD FX-6330 Six-Core scores 4433, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 2500X's score of 9455. This makes the AMD Ryzen 5 2500X a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
  • Higher Power Consumption: The AMD FX-6330 Six-Core has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 2500X's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.


Productivity


AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

AMD FX-6330 Six-Core
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

AMD FX-6330 Six-Core
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.



Verdict

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X

The AMD Ryzen 5 2500X is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

AMD FX-6330 Six-Core

The AMD FX-6330 Six-Core is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.