🚀 CPU Launch

Home » Compare » AMD-Ryzen-5-2600X-vs-AMD-Athlon-X4-880K

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X vs AMD Athlon X4 880K

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between AMD Ryzen 5 2600X and AMD Athlon X4 880K

Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD. AMD Athlon X4 880K has a higher base speed of 4.0 GHz compared to AMD Ryzen 5 2600X's 3.6 GHz. Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of 4.2 GHz. AMD Ryzen 5 2600X has more cores (6) compared to AMD Athlon X4 880K's 4 cores. AMD Ryzen 5 2600X supports more threads (12) compared to AMD Athlon X4 880K's threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. AMD Ryzen 5 2600X uses the AM4 socket, while AMD Athlon X4 880K uses the FM2+ socket. AMD Ryzen 5 2600X was launched in Q2 2018, while AMD Athlon X4 880K was launched in Q2 2016. AMD Ryzen 5 2600X has a larger L3 cache of 16 MB compared to AMD Athlon X4 880K's MB.

Specification Summary

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X and AMD Athlon X4 880K are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
  • Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X has a base speed of 3.6 GHz, while the AMD Athlon X4 880K runs at 4.0 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X supports a turbo speed of 4.2 GHz, compared to 4.2 GHz for the AMD Athlon X4 880K.
  • Cores: The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X has 6 cores, while the AMD Athlon X4 880K has 4 cores.
  • Threads: The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X supports 12 threads, compared to threads for the AMD Athlon X4 880K.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X uses the AM4, while the AMD Athlon X4 880K uses the FM2+.
  • Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X was launched on Q2 2018, while the AMD Athlon X4 880K was released on Q2 2016.
  • L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X has 16 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Athlon X4 880K.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs AMD Ryzen 5 2600X AMD Athlon X4 880K
AMD AMD
Manufacturer AMD AMD
Speed 3.6 GHz 4.0 GHz
Turbo 4.2 GHz 4.2 GHz
Cores 6 4
Threads 12
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket AM4 FM2+
Launched Q2 2018 Q2 2016
L3 Cache 16 MB MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X:



39%
AMD Athlon X4 880K:
27%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X



20%
AMD Athlon X4 880K:
5%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X: 95 watts



23.75%
AMD Athlon X4 880K: 95 watts
23.75%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


AMD Ryzen 5 2600X : Q2 2018 ✅

AMD Athlon X4 880K : Q2 2016 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X



AMD Athlon X4 880K


Pro's and Con's

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X was launched more recently (Q2 2018) compared to the AMD Athlon X4 880K (Q2 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2382, the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the AMD Athlon X4 880K (score: 1633). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
  • Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X features a larger L3 cache of 16MB compared to the AMD Athlon X4 880K's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
  • Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X has a higher CPU Mark score of 193.30 compared to the AMD Athlon X4 880K's 38.71. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

  • Not available

AMD Athlon X4 880K – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 880K has a higher base clock speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X's 3.6 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.

Cons:

  • Fewer Cores: The AMD Athlon X4 880K has 4 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X's 6 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
  • Fewer Threads: The AMD Athlon X4 880K has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X's 12 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon X4 880K scores 3663, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X's score of 13896. This makes the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.


Productivity


AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

AMD Athlon X4 880K
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.

AMD Athlon X4 880K
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.



Verdict

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

AMD Athlon X4 880K

The AMD Athlon X4 880K is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.