Comparison between AMD Ryzen 5 3600 and AMD FX-6330 Six-Core
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
Both CPUs have the same base speed of 3.6 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of 4.2 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (6).
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 supports more threads (12) compared to AMD FX-6330 Six-Core's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket, while AMD FX-6330 Six-Core uses the AM3+ socket.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 was launched in Q2 2019, while AMD FX-6330 Six-Core was launched in Q4 2016.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 has a larger L3 cache of 32 MB compared to AMD FX-6330 Six-Core's 8 MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 and AMD FX-6330 Six-Core are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 has a base speed of 3.6 GHz, while the AMD FX-6330 Six-Core runs at 3.6 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 supports a turbo speed of 4.2 GHz, compared to 4.2 GHz for the AMD FX-6330 Six-Core.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 has 6 cores, while the AMD FX-6330 Six-Core has 6 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 supports 12 threads, compared to threads for the AMD FX-6330 Six-Core.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4, while the AMD FX-6330 Six-Core uses the AM3+.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 was launched on Q2 2019, while the AMD FX-6330 Six-Core was released on Q4 2016.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 has 32 MB of L3 cache, compared to 8 MB for the AMD FX-6330 Six-Core.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Turbo
4.2 GHz
4.2 GHz
Cores
6
6
Threads
12
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
AM3+
Launched
Q2 2019
Q4 2016
L3 Cache
32 MB
8 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 5 3600:
42%
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core:
25%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
25%
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core:
6%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 5 3600: 65 watts
16.25%
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core: 95 watts
23.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 : Q2 2019 ✅
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core : Q4 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2566, the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the AMD FX-6330 Six-Core (score: 1531). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 features a larger L3 cache of 32MB compared to the AMD FX-6330 Six-Core's 8MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Not available
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD FX-6330 Six-Core was launched more recently (Q4 2016) compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 (Q2 2019). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD FX-6330 Six-Core has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 3600's 188.74. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD FX-6330 Six-Core has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 3600's 12 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD FX-6330 Six-Core scores 4433, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 3600's score of 17740. This makes the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD FX-6330 Six-Core has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 3600's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core
The AMD FX-6330 Six-Core is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.