Comparison between AMD Ryzen 5 3600X and Intel Core i7-9700T
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Core i7-9700T is manufactured by Intel.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X has a higher base speed of 3.8 GHz compared to Intel Core i7-9700T's 2.0 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X has a higher turbo speed of 4.4 GHz compared to Intel Core i7-9700T's 4.3 GHz.
Intel Core i7-9700T has more cores (8) compared to AMD Ryzen 5 3600X's 6 cores.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X supports more threads (12) compared to Intel Core i7-9700T's 8 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X uses the AM4 socket, while Intel Core i7-9700T uses the FCLGA1151-2 socket.
Both CPUs were launched in the same year: Q3 2019.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X has a larger L3 cache of 32 MB compared to Intel Core i7-9700T's 12 MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 5 3600X and Intel Core i7-9700T are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 3600X has a base speed of 3.8 GHz, while the Intel Core i7-9700T runs at 2.0 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 5 3600X supports a turbo speed of 4.4 GHz, compared to 4.3 GHz for the Intel Core i7-9700T.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 5 3600X has 6 cores, while the Intel Core i7-9700T has 8 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 5 3600X supports 12 threads, compared to 8 threads for the Intel Core i7-9700T.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 5 3600X uses the AM4, while the Intel Core i7-9700T uses the FCLGA1151-2.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 5 3600X was launched on Q3 2019, while the Intel Core i7-9700T was released on Q3 2019.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 3600X has 32 MB of L3 cache, compared to 12 MB for the Intel Core i7-9700T.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
Intel Core i7-9700T
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
3.8 GHz
2.0 GHz
Turbo
4.4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Cores
6
8
Threads
12
8
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
FCLGA1151-2
Launched
Q3 2019
Q3 2019
L3 Cache
32 MB
12 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X:
44%
Intel Core i7-9700T:
40%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
26%
Intel Core i7-9700T:
15%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: 95 watts
23.75%
Intel Core i7-9700T: 35 watts
8.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X : Q3 2019 ✅
Intel Core i7-9700T : Q3 2019 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
Intel Core i7-9700T
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 3600X has a higher base clock speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the Intel Core i7-9700T's 2.0 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 3600X supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.4 GHz compared to the Intel Core i7-9700T's 4.3 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2651, the AMD Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms the Intel Core i7-9700T (score: 2439). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 3600X features a larger L3 cache of 32MB compared to the Intel Core i7-9700T's 12MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 5 3600X has a higher CPU Mark score of 233.10 compared to the Intel Core i7-9700T's 33.36. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Ryzen 5 3600X has 6 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core i7-9700T's 8 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 5 3600X has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the Intel Core i7-9700T's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Core i7-9700T – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Not available
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The Intel Core i7-9700T has 8 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 3600X's 12 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Core i7-9700T scores 10776, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 3600X's score of 18180. This makes the AMD Ryzen 5 3600X a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Core i7-9700T
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Intel Core i7-9700T
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
The AMD Ryzen 5 3600X is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Core i7-9700T
The Intel Core i7-9700T is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
