Comparison between AMD Ryzen 5 4400G and AMD FX-670K Quad-Core
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
Both CPUs have the same base speed of 3.7 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of 4.3 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 4400G has more cores (6) compared to AMD FX-670K Quad-Core's 4 cores.
AMD Ryzen 5 4400G supports more threads (12) compared to AMD FX-670K Quad-Core's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen 5 4400G uses the AM4 socket, while AMD FX-670K Quad-Core uses the FM2 socket.
AMD Ryzen 5 4400G was launched in Q2 2023, while AMD FX-670K Quad-Core was launched in Q2 2014.
AMD Ryzen 5 4400G has a larger L3 cache of 16 MB compared to AMD FX-670K Quad-Core's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 5 4400G and AMD FX-670K Quad-Core are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 4400G has a base speed of 3.7 GHz, while the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core runs at 3.7 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 5 4400G supports a turbo speed of 4.3 GHz, compared to 4.3 GHz for the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 5 4400G has 6 cores, while the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 5 4400G supports 12 threads, compared to threads for the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 5 4400G uses the AM4, while the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core uses the FM2.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 5 4400G was launched on Q2 2023, while the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core was released on Q2 2014.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 4400G has 16 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 5 4400G
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Turbo
4.3 GHz
4.3 GHz
Cores
6
4
Threads
12
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
FM2
Launched
Q2 2023
Q2 2014
L3 Cache
16 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 5 4400G:
45%
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core:
26%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 5 4400G
24%
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core:
4%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 5 4400G: 65 watts
16.25%
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 5 4400G : Q2 2023 ✅
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core : Q2 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 5 4400G
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 5 4400G – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 5 4400G was launched more recently (Q2 2023) compared to the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core (Q2 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2711, the AMD Ryzen 5 4400G outperforms the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core (score: 1578). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 4400G features a larger L3 cache of 16MB compared to the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Not available
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Not available
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD FX-670K Quad-Core has 4 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 4400G's 6 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The AMD FX-670K Quad-Core has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 4400G's 12 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core scores 2980, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 4400G's score of 17160. This makes the AMD Ryzen 5 4400G a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 5 4400G
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 5 4400G
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 5 4400G
The AMD Ryzen 5 4400G is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core
The AMD FX-670K Quad-Core is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
