Comparison between AMD Ryzen 5 5600T and Intel Celeron J4025
AMD Ryzen 5 5600T is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Celeron J4025 is manufactured by Intel.
AMD Ryzen 5 5600T has a higher base speed of 3.5 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J4025's 2.0 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 5600T has a higher turbo speed of 4.5 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J4025's 2.9 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 5600T has more cores (6) compared to Intel Celeron J4025's 2 cores.
AMD Ryzen 5 5600T supports more threads (12) compared to Intel Celeron J4025's 2 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen 5 5600T uses the AM4 socket, while Intel Celeron J4025 uses the FCBGA1090 socket.
AMD Ryzen 5 5600T was launched in Q4 2024, while Intel Celeron J4025 was launched in Q1 2020.
AMD Ryzen 5 5600T has a larger L3 cache of 32 MB compared to Intel Celeron J4025's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 5 5600T and Intel Celeron J4025 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 5600T has a base speed of 3.5 GHz, while the Intel Celeron J4025 runs at 2.0 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 5 5600T supports a turbo speed of 4.5 GHz, compared to 2.9 GHz for the Intel Celeron J4025.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 5 5600T has 6 cores, while the Intel Celeron J4025 has 2 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 5 5600T supports 12 threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron J4025.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 5 5600T uses the AM4, while the Intel Celeron J4025 uses the FCBGA1090.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 5 5600T was launched on Q4 2024, while the Intel Celeron J4025 was released on Q1 2020.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 5600T has 32 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the Intel Celeron J4025.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600T
Intel Celeron J4025
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
3.5 GHz
2.0 GHz
Turbo
4.5 GHz
2.9 GHz
Cores
6
2
Threads
12
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
FCBGA1090
Launched
Q4 2024
Q1 2020
L3 Cache
32 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 5 5600T:
56%
Intel Celeron J4025:
19%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 5 5600T
32%
Intel Celeron J4025:
2%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 5 5600T: 65 watts
16.25%
Intel Celeron J4025: 10 watts
2.5%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 5 5600T : Q4 2024 ✅
Intel Celeron J4025 : Q1 2020 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 5 5600T
Intel Celeron J4025
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 5 5600T – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 5 5600T was launched more recently (Q4 2024) compared to the Intel Celeron J4025 (Q1 2020). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 5600T has a higher base clock speed of 3.5 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J4025's 2.0 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 5600T supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.5 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J4025's 2.9 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 3393, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600T outperforms the Intel Celeron J4025 (score: 1147). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 5600T features a larger L3 cache of 32MB compared to the Intel Celeron J4025's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 5 5600T has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron J4025's 10W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Celeron J4025 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron J4025 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 5600T's 180.04. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron J4025 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 5600T's 6 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron J4025 has 2 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 5600T's 12 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron J4025 scores 1477, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 5600T's score of 22325. This makes the AMD Ryzen 5 5600T a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 5 5600T
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Celeron J4025
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 5 5600T
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Intel Celeron J4025
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 5 5600T
The AMD Ryzen 5 5600T is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Celeron J4025
The Intel Celeron J4025 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
