Comparison between AMD Ryzen 5 8600G and AMD FX-4320
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD Ryzen 5 8600G has a higher base speed of 4.3 GHz compared to AMD FX-4320's 4.0 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 8600G has a higher turbo speed of 5.0 GHz compared to AMD FX-4320's 4.2 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 8600G has more cores (6) compared to AMD FX-4320's 4 cores.
AMD Ryzen 5 8600G supports more threads (12) compared to AMD FX-4320's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen 5 8600G uses the AM5 socket, while AMD FX-4320 uses the AM3+ socket.
AMD Ryzen 5 8600G was launched in Q1 2024, while AMD FX-4320 was launched in Q1 2016.
AMD Ryzen 5 8600G has a larger L3 cache of 16 MB compared to AMD FX-4320's 4 MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 5 8600G and AMD FX-4320 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 8600G has a base speed of 4.3 GHz, while the AMD FX-4320 runs at 4.0 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 5 8600G supports a turbo speed of 5.0 GHz, compared to 4.2 GHz for the AMD FX-4320.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 5 8600G has 6 cores, while the AMD FX-4320 has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 5 8600G supports 12 threads, compared to threads for the AMD FX-4320.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 5 8600G uses the AM5, while the AMD FX-4320 uses the AM3+.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 5 8600G was launched on Q1 2024, while the AMD FX-4320 was released on Q1 2016.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 8600G has 16 MB of L3 cache, compared to 4 MB for the AMD FX-4320.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 5 8600G
AMD FX-4320
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
4.3 GHz
4.0 GHz
Turbo
5.0 GHz
4.2 GHz
Cores
6
4
Threads
12
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM5
AM3+
Launched
Q1 2024
Q1 2016
L3 Cache
16 MB
4 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 5 8600G:
64%
AMD FX-4320:
26%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 5 8600G
36%
AMD FX-4320:
4%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 5 8600G: 65 watts
16.25%
AMD FX-4320: 95 watts
23.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 5 8600G : Q1 2024 ✅
AMD FX-4320 : Q1 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 5 8600G
AMD FX-4320
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 5 8600G – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 5 8600G was launched more recently (Q1 2024) compared to the AMD FX-4320 (Q1 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 8600G has a higher base clock speed of 4.3 GHz compared to the AMD FX-4320's 4.0 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 8600G supports a higher turbo boost speed of 5.0 GHz compared to the AMD FX-4320's 4.2 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 3890, the AMD Ryzen 5 8600G outperforms the AMD FX-4320 (score: 1564). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 8600G features a larger L3 cache of 16MB compared to the AMD FX-4320's 4MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Not available
AMD FX-4320 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD FX-4320 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 8600G's 149.33. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD FX-4320 has 4 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 8600G's 6 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The AMD FX-4320 has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 8600G's 12 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD FX-4320 scores 3150, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 8600G's score of 25345. This makes the AMD Ryzen 5 8600G a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD FX-4320 has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 8600G's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 5 8600G
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD FX-4320
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 5 8600G
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
AMD FX-4320
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 5 8600G
The AMD Ryzen 5 8600G is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD FX-4320
The AMD FX-4320 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
