Comparison between AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Intel Core i5-8400
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Core i5-8400 is manufactured by Intel.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has a higher base speed of 3.2 GHz compared to Intel Core i5-8400's 2.8 GHz.
Intel Core i5-8400 has a higher turbo speed of 4.0 GHz compared to AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600's 3.6 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (6).
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 supports more threads (12) compared to Intel Core i5-8400's 6 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 uses the AM4 socket, while Intel Core i5-8400 uses the FCLGA1151-2 socket.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 was launched in Q3 2017, while Intel Core i5-8400 was launched in Q4 2017.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has a larger L3 cache of 16 MB compared to Intel Core i5-8400's 9 MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Intel Core i5-8400 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has a base speed of 3.2 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-8400 runs at 2.8 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 supports a turbo speed of 3.6 GHz, compared to 4.0 GHz for the Intel Core i5-8400.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has 6 cores, while the Intel Core i5-8400 has 6 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 supports 12 threads, compared to 6 threads for the Intel Core i5-8400.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 uses the AM4, while the Intel Core i5-8400 uses the FCLGA1151-2.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 was launched on Q3 2017, while the Intel Core i5-8400 was released on Q4 2017.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has 16 MB of L3 cache, compared to 9 MB for the Intel Core i5-8400.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
Intel Core i5-8400
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
3.2 GHz
2.8 GHz
Turbo
3.6 GHz
4.0 GHz
Cores
6
6
Threads
12
6
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
FCLGA1151-2
Launched
Q3 2017
Q4 2017
L3 Cache
16 MB
9 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600:
31%
Intel Core i5-8400:
39%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
16%
Intel Core i5-8400:
13%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600: 65 watts
16.25%
Intel Core i5-8400: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 : Q3 2017 ✅
Intel Core i5-8400 : Q4 2017 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
Intel Core i5-8400
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has a higher base clock speed of 3.2 GHz compared to the Intel Core i5-8400's 2.8 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 features a larger L3 cache of 16MB compared to the Intel Core i5-8400's 9MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Core i5-8400's 105.99. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Not available
Intel Core i5-8400 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Core i5-8400 was launched more recently (Q4 2017) compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 (Q3 2017). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Core i5-8400 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600's 3.6 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2380, the Intel Core i5-8400 outperforms the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 (score: 1884). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The Intel Core i5-8400 has 6 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600's 12 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Core i5-8400 scores 9235, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600's score of 11240. This makes the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Core i5-8400
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Intel Core i5-8400
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Core i5-8400
The Intel Core i5-8400 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
