Comparison between AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and Intel Core i3-8300
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Core i3-8300 is manufactured by Intel.
Intel Core i3-8300 has a higher base speed of 3.7 GHz compared to AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G's 3.6 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G has a higher turbo speed of 3.9 GHz compared to Intel Core i3-8300's GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4).
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G supports more threads (8) compared to Intel Core i3-8300's 4 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G uses the AM4 socket, while Intel Core i3-8300 uses the FCLGA1151-2 socket.
Both CPUs were launched in the same year: Q2 2018.
Intel Core i3-8300 has a larger L3 cache of 8 MB compared to AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G's 4 MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and Intel Core i3-8300 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G has a base speed of 3.6 GHz, while the Intel Core i3-8300 runs at 3.7 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G supports a turbo speed of 3.9 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Core i3-8300.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G has 4 cores, while the Intel Core i3-8300 has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G supports 8 threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Core i3-8300.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G uses the AM4, while the Intel Core i3-8300 uses the FCLGA1151-2.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G was launched on Q2 2018, while the Intel Core i3-8300 was released on Q2 2018.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to 8 MB for the Intel Core i3-8300.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
Intel Core i3-8300
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Turbo
3.9 GHz
GHz
Cores
4
4
Threads
8
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
FCLGA1151-2
Launched
Q2 2018
Q2 2018
L3 Cache
4 MB
8 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G:
35%
Intel Core i3-8300:
37%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
12%
Intel Core i3-8300:
9%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G: 65 watts
16.25%
Intel Core i3-8300: 62 watts
15.5%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G : Q2 2018 ✅
Intel Core i3-8300 : Q2 2018 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
Intel Core i3-8300
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.9 GHz compared to the Intel Core i3-8300's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Core i3-8300's 68.38. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Core i3-8300's 62W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Core i3-8300 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Core i3-8300 has a higher base clock speed of 3.7 GHz compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G's 3.6 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2262, the Intel Core i3-8300 outperforms the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G (score: 2156). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-8300 features a larger L3 cache of 8MB compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G's 4MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The Intel Core i3-8300 has 4 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G's 8 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Core i3-8300 scores 6328, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G's score of 8537. This makes the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Core i3-8300
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Core i3-8300
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Core i3-8300
The Intel Core i3-8300 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
