Comparison between AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 and Intel Core i3-4370T
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Core i3-4370T is manufactured by Intel.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 has a higher base speed of 3.6 GHz compared to Intel Core i3-4370T's 3.3 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 has more cores (6) compared to Intel Core i3-4370T's 2 cores.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 supports more threads (12) compared to Intel Core i3-4370T's 4 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 uses the AM4 socket, while Intel Core i3-4370T uses the FCLGA1150 socket.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 was launched in Q3 2019, while Intel Core i3-4370T was launched in Q4 2017.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 has a larger L3 cache of 32 MB compared to Intel Core i3-4370T's 4 MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 and Intel Core i3-4370T are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 has a base speed of 3.6 GHz, while the Intel Core i3-4370T runs at 3.3 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Core i3-4370T.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 has 6 cores, while the Intel Core i3-4370T has 2 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 supports 12 threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Core i3-4370T.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 uses the AM4, while the Intel Core i3-4370T uses the FCLGA1150.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 was launched on Q3 2019, while the Intel Core i3-4370T was released on Q4 2017.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 has 32 MB of L3 cache, compared to 4 MB for the Intel Core i3-4370T.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
Intel Core i3-4370T
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
3.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Turbo
GHz
GHz
Cores
6
2
Threads
12
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
FCLGA1150
Launched
Q3 2019
Q4 2017
L3 Cache
32 MB
4 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600:
41%
Intel Core i3-4370T:
31%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
25%
Intel Core i3-4370T:
4%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600: 65 watts
16.25%
Intel Core i3-4370T: 35 watts
8.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 : Q3 2019 ✅
Intel Core i3-4370T : Q4 2017 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
Intel Core i3-4370T
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 has a higher base clock speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the Intel Core i3-4370T's 3.3 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2495, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 outperforms the Intel Core i3-4370T (score: 1911). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 features a larger L3 cache of 32MB compared to the Intel Core i3-4370T's 4MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Core i3-4370T's 24.35. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Core i3-4370T's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Core i3-4370T – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Core i3-4370T was launched more recently (Q4 2017) compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 (Q3 2019). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Core i3-4370T has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600's 6 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Core i3-4370T has 4 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600's 12 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Core i3-4370T scores 3361, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600's score of 17402. This makes the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Core i3-4370T
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Intel Core i3-4370T
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Core i3-4370T
The Intel Core i3-4370T is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
