Comparison between AMD Ryzen 7 4700G and AMD Athlon II X4 655
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD Ryzen 7 4700G has a higher base speed of 3.6 GHz compared to AMD Athlon II X4 655's 3.3 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 7 4700G has a higher turbo speed of 4.4 GHz compared to AMD Athlon II X4 655's GHz.
AMD Ryzen 7 4700G has more cores (8) compared to AMD Athlon II X4 655's 4 cores.
AMD Ryzen 7 4700G supports more threads (16) compared to AMD Athlon II X4 655's 4 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen 7 4700G uses the AM4 socket, while AMD Athlon II X4 655 uses the AM2+ socket.
AMD Ryzen 7 4700G was launched in Q3 2020, while AMD Athlon II X4 655 was launched in Q1 2014.
AMD Ryzen 7 4700G has a larger L3 cache of 8 MB compared to AMD Athlon II X4 655's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 7 4700G and AMD Athlon II X4 655 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 7 4700G has a base speed of 3.6 GHz, while the AMD Athlon II X4 655 runs at 3.3 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 7 4700G supports a turbo speed of 4.4 GHz, compared to GHz for the AMD Athlon II X4 655.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 7 4700G has 8 cores, while the AMD Athlon II X4 655 has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 7 4700G supports 16 threads, compared to 4 threads for the AMD Athlon II X4 655.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 7 4700G uses the AM4, while the AMD Athlon II X4 655 uses the AM2+.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 7 4700G was launched on Q3 2020, while the AMD Athlon II X4 655 was released on Q1 2014.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 7 4700G has 8 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Athlon II X4 655.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 7 4700G
AMD Athlon II X4 655
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Turbo
4.4 GHz
GHz
Cores
8
4
Threads
16
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
AM2+
Launched
Q3 2020
Q1 2014
L3 Cache
8 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 7 4700G:
45%
AMD Athlon II X4 655:
24%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 7 4700G
29%
AMD Athlon II X4 655:
3%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 7 4700G: 65 watts
16.25%
AMD Athlon II X4 655: 95 watts
23.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 7 4700G : Q3 2020 ✅
AMD Athlon II X4 655 : Q1 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 7 4700G
AMD Athlon II X4 655
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 7 4700G – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 7 4700G was launched more recently (Q3 2020) compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 655 (Q1 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 7 4700G has a higher base clock speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 655's 3.3 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 7 4700G supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.4 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 655's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2739, the AMD Ryzen 7 4700G outperforms the AMD Athlon II X4 655 (score: 1473). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 7 4700G features a larger L3 cache of 8MB compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 655's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Not available
AMD Athlon II X4 655 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Athlon II X4 655 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 4700G's 85.70. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Athlon II X4 655 has 4 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 7 4700G's 8 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The AMD Athlon II X4 655 has 4 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 7 4700G's 16 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon II X4 655 scores 2078, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 4700G's score of 20150. This makes the AMD Ryzen 7 4700G a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Athlon II X4 655 has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 4700G's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 7 4700G
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Athlon II X4 655
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 7 4700G
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Athlon II X4 655
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 7 4700G
The AMD Ryzen 7 4700G is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Athlon II X4 655
The AMD Athlon II X4 655 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
